Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
I'm interested in litigation and international arbitration. Commitment to pro bono is also very important to me. Does anyone have any insight into how the culture at these two firms differs, opportunities they would each create for lateraling or exiting into a different career later if I felt like doing so, etc. All the people I met at both seemed very nice but I think I felt a bit more at home at A&P in terms of vibe, culture etc.
I would appreciate any thoughts.
I would appreciate any thoughts.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Fri Aug 29, 2014 1:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
I can't speak to Sidley, but I have an offer in hand from AP and thought the people are absolutely terrific. Their juniors work on really substantive lit projects as well. Nice office space. Definitely a firm built on it's lit practice, but it does well in corporate too.
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
Also, not sure about specializing at Sidley, but at AP they like heir litigators to be generalists at least for the beginning, so you'll see everything from White Collar to Products Liability and Mass Tort to General Commercial.
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
That sounds wonderful. My concern is that at Sidley I wouldn't be given as much substantive work since they seem to have a much higher associate to partner ration, and more bureaucracy.
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
Nice, that is definitely a plus for A&P.Anonymous User wrote:Also, not sure about specializing at Sidley, but at AP they like heir litigators to be generalists at least for the beginning, so you'll see everything from White Collar to Products Liability and Mass Tort to General Commercial.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
anyone want to stand up for Sidley?
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
Sidley litigators also start off as generalists.Anonymous User wrote:Nice, that is definitely a plus for A&P.Anonymous User wrote:Also, not sure about specializing at Sidley, but at AP they like heir litigators to be generalists at least for the beginning, so you'll see everything from White Collar to Products Liability and Mass Tort to General Commercial.
I work in transactions so I can't comment on the substantive work aspect. However, Sidley's management is top notch. It's a very tightly run ship which places a (relatively) large emphasis on associate development.Anonymous User wrote:That sounds wonderful. My concern is that at Sidley I wouldn't be given as much substantive work since they seem to have a much higher associate to partner ration, and more bureaucracy.
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
Original anon- did you get an offer from A&P NY, if so when was your callback? I've been waiting for what seems like forever so I'm expecting a rejection 

-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
Sidley has a pigeon holing system in place that will haveyou working on mainly one thing for a long time. You also have to choose after your SA what you want to do for the rest of your life. People are great though...Anonymous User wrote:That sounds wonderful. My concern is that at Sidley I wouldn't be given as much substantive work since they seem to have a much higher associate to partner ration, and more bureaucracy.
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
I've heard the people are pretty wonderful at both. Is there a perception out there that Sidley is a bigger name brand, and will thus provide more potential exit options?
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
This is absolutely untrue, especially for litigation associates, who start off as generalists. And while it's true that you choose your practice group after your SA, it's not uncommon for associates to switch groups after a year or two. Frankly, I'd rather have that option than be forced into an arbitrary rotation system.Anonymous User wrote:Sidley has a pigeon holing system in place that will haveyou working on mainly one thing for a long time. You also have to choose after your SA what you want to do for the rest of your life. People are great though...Anonymous User wrote:That sounds wonderful. My concern is that at Sidley I wouldn't be given as much substantive work since they seem to have a much higher associate to partner ration, and more bureaucracy.
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
same questionAnonymous User wrote:I've heard the people are pretty wonderful at both. Is there a perception out there that Sidley is a bigger name brand, and will thus provide more potential exit options?
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
Really? Well I was told something else during my CB with transactional partners and associates. And also met with first and second year associates who said that it was mostly true but not necessarily a bad thing.Anonymous User wrote:This is absolutely untrue, especially for litigation associates, who start off as generalists. And while it's true that you choose your practice group after your SA, it's not uncommon for associates to switch groups after a year or two. Frankly, I'd rather have that option than be forced into an arbitrary rotation system.Anonymous User wrote:Sidley has a pigeon holing system in place that will haveyou working on mainly one thing for a long time. You also have to choose after your SA what you want to do for the rest of your life. People are great though...Anonymous User wrote:That sounds wonderful. My concern is that at Sidley I wouldn't be given as much substantive work since they seem to have a much higher associate to partner ration, and more bureaucracy.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
I would imagine that most people don't switch because they simply like their group. The hybrid free-market SA assignment system lets you take on whatever projects you want, so most people have a decent idea of where they want to be by the end of the summer. I spoke with numerous associates who had switched groups or were in the process of switching (sometimes more than once) and none seemed to think it was an especially onerous process. Obviously the needs of the practice group will come first, but Sidley's corporate groups are booming right now and would probably be happy to have an extra body. Switching into a smaller group like Tax might prove more difficult.Anonymous User wrote:Really? Well I was told something else during my CB with transactional partners and associates. And also met with first and second year associates who said that it was mostly true but not necessarily a bad thing.Anonymous User wrote:This is absolutely untrue, especially for litigation associates, who start off as generalists. And while it's true that you choose your practice group after your SA, it's not uncommon for associates to switch groups after a year or two. Frankly, I'd rather have that option than be forced into an arbitrary rotation system.Anonymous User wrote:Sidley has a pigeon holing system in place that will haveyou working on mainly one thing for a long time. You also have to choose after your SA what you want to do for the rest of your life. People are great though...Anonymous User wrote:That sounds wonderful. My concern is that at Sidley I wouldn't be given as much substantive work since they seem to have a much higher associate to partner ration, and more bureaucracy.
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
I'm bumping this since I'm really still struggling to make a decision.
My biggest question is: if I ever wanted to lateral to another firm in a couple of years, would having Sidley NY on my resume open significantly more doors than Arnold & Porter NY?
My biggest question is: if I ever wanted to lateral to another firm in a couple of years, would having Sidley NY on my resume open significantly more doors than Arnold & Porter NY?
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
I wouldn't based my decision on this factor. Try looking for other differences/things you care about. e.g. offer rateAnonymous User wrote:I'm bumping this since I'm really still struggling to make a decision.
My biggest question is: if I ever wanted to lateral to another firm in a couple of years, would having Sidley NY on my resume open significantly more doors than Arnold & Porter NY?
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
This is one of the most important factors to me. The both have basically 100% offer rates.Anonymous User wrote:I wouldn't based my decision on this factor. Try looking for other differences/things you care about. e.g. offer rateAnonymous User wrote:I'm bumping this since I'm really still struggling to make a decision.
My biggest question is: if I ever wanted to lateral to another firm in a couple of years, would having Sidley NY on my resume open significantly more doors than Arnold & Porter NY?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
When considering that the ability to move to another firm probably depends on so many factors and that both firms have similar "prestige" any info we can provide related to exit opportunities will be of negligible value.Anonymous User wrote:This is one of the most important factors to me. The both have basically 100% offer rates.Anonymous User wrote:I wouldn't based my decision on this factor. Try looking for other differences/things you care about. e.g. offer rateAnonymous User wrote:I'm bumping this since I'm really still struggling to make a decision.
My biggest question is: if I ever wanted to lateral to another firm in a couple of years, would having Sidley NY on my resume open significantly more doors than Arnold & Porter NY?
For what its worth, I had a CB with Sidley and thb I thought the people in litigation were great. They seemed honest, amicable, etc.
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
I guess I wasn't sure that they are similar in prestige. Sidley seemed to be higher ranked?
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
Sidley is undoubtedly more "prestigious" but that shouldn't really play into your decision too much. If you're concerned about exit ops outside of NYC, the primary benefit to going to Sidley will come from its nationwide presence and huge network.Anonymous User wrote:I guess I wasn't sure that they are similar in prestige. Sidley seemed to be higher ranked?
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
According to NALPAnonymous User wrote:I'm interested in litigation and international arbitration. Commitment to pro bono is also very important to me. Does anyone have any insight into how the culture at these two firms differs, opportunities they would each create for lateraling or exiting into a different career later if I felt like doing so, etc. All the people I met at both seemed very nice but I think I felt a bit more at home at A&P in terms of vibe, culture etc.
I would appreciate any thoughts.
Sidley - Average pro bono hours per associate last year 96.3
A&P - Average pro bono hours per associate last year 175.3
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
Okay, I see. So perhaps exit options will be more affected by the quality of my work/the responsibility I have rather than the vault ranking of the firm I go to (at least to some extent)? I don't really care about prestige but also don't want to shoot myself in the foot by going to the "less prestigious" firm and then having significantly reduced exit options if it turns out that A&P isn't where I want to spend my entire career.Anonymous User wrote:Sidley is undoubtedly more "prestigious" but that shouldn't really play into your decision too much. If you're concerned about exit ops outside of NYC, the primary benefit to going to Sidley will come from its nationwide presence and huge network.Anonymous User wrote:I guess I wasn't sure that they are similar in prestige. Sidley seemed to be higher ranked?
-
- Posts: 432505
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Sidley NY vs. Arnold & Porter NY
Yes, this is a huge plus for A&P. They do really awesome pro bono work and seem to have more of a genuine commitment to it.Anonymous User wrote:According to NALPAnonymous User wrote:I'm interested in litigation and international arbitration. Commitment to pro bono is also very important to me. Does anyone have any insight into how the culture at these two firms differs, opportunities they would each create for lateraling or exiting into a different career later if I felt like doing so, etc. All the people I met at both seemed very nice but I think I felt a bit more at home at A&P in terms of vibe, culture etc.
I would appreciate any thoughts.
Sidley - Average pro bono hours per associate last year 96.3
A&P - Average pro bono hours per associate last year 175.3
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login