Akin Gump CC v. Proskauer LA v. OMM LA Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
pandabear7092
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:13 pm
Akin Gump CC v. Proskauer LA v. OMM LA
any info on any of these firms is also most welcome.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432573
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Akin Gump CC v. Proskauer LA v. OMM LA
Just an FYI, Proskauer is in CC as well.pandabear7092 wrote:any info on any of these firms is also most welcome.
-
pandabear7092
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 4:13 pm
Re: Akin Gump CC v. Proskauer LA v. OMM LA
yes, sorry that's what I meant.Anonymous User wrote:Just an FYI, Proskauer is in CC as well.pandabear7092 wrote:any info on any of these firms is also most welcome.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432573
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Akin Gump CC v. Proskauer LA v. OMM LA
can anyone speak to Akin LA? Culture, hours, strength of lit and corp in CA, etc
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432573
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Akin Gump CC v. Proskauer LA v. OMM LA
Take this with a MASSIVE grain of salt considering I only did a cb with them, but I thought they were the coolest attorneys I met with during the oci process. I really liked the people I met and the vibe I got and very nearly accepted their offer.Anonymous User wrote:can anyone speak to Akin LA? Culture, hours, strength of lit and corp in CA, etc
This is fairly useless since it was only a screener-cb, but yeah.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432573
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Akin Gump CC v. Proskauer LA v. OMM LA
Proskauer is good for corporate, can't say lit is great. OMM is better than Akin Gump for lit imo. I actually have the opposite opinion of akin gump. the two attorneys i had a screener with were literally the worst. they talked amongst themselves about something unrelated to my resume the entire time. i really don't like to judge a firm by two attorneys but it was honestly the worst interview I've ever had. go with OMM and don't look back.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432573
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Akin Gump CC v. Proskauer LA v. OMM LA
Anon from before. Thats actually hilarious, because during OCI I had an similarly awful interviewing experience where the two attorneys talked between themselves about something not even related to me, only it was with OMM LA, lol.Anonymous User wrote:Proskauer is good for corporate, can't say lit is great. OMM is better than Akin Gump for lit imo. I actually have the opposite opinion of akin gump. the two attorneys i had a screener with were literally the worst. they talked amongst themselves about something unrelated to my resume the entire time. i really don't like to judge a firm by two attorneys but it was honestly the worst interview I've ever had. go with OMM and don't look back.
but to be more helpful to OP, if I were you I would probably pick OMM LA, mostly based on stuff I've heard from attorneys and their band 2 rank in Chambers.
