Lets Talk Boston Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Single-Malt-Liquor
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 4:49 pm
Lets Talk Boston
As someone who's targeting Boston and NYC at OCI, I'd like more insight into the differences between working in the two cities. Having lived in both, I know about the cultural differences of the two cities but am more so looking at how firm culture/type of work seems to differ between the two locals. TYIA.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
Interested as well
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
The Ropes & Gray's of Boston are identical to their NYC sweatshop counterparts. Aside from the obvious comparison that New York is the hotter, sluttier sister of the two... Do you have any firms you're specifically looking to compare?
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
What Boston offices can you comment on?Anonymous User wrote:The Ropes & Gray's of Boston are identical to their NYC sweatshop counterparts. Aside from the obvious comparison that New York is the hotter, sluttier sister of the two... Do you have any firms you're specifically looking to compare?
Not OP, but I'd be interested in hearing about any Boston office you have info on. Ropes, Wilmer, Goodwin, Nutter, Latham, Weil, Proskauer, Skadden, Fish, Sullivan & Worchester, Gunderson, Greenburg, etc. What do you know?
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
Boston firms seem to really value science backgrounds. Probably because there is a huge biotech industry here.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
Bump, because I want to know what places have the best reputation for litigation boutiques.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
Boston is a much smaller market, though with a lot of IP/patent law. More opportunities generally in NYC.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
- Ropes: top corporate practice in Boston; great PE, technology, life sciences, and IP practices; quality of corporate work comparable to NYC V10
- Wilmer: great litigation practice; weaker corporate practice
- Goodwin: great corporate practice; especially in technology and emerging companies; can be compared to Wilson Sonsini on the West Coast
- Holland & Knight: not sure
- foley hoag: not sure
- Choate: not sure
- Wilmer: great litigation practice; weaker corporate practice
- Goodwin: great corporate practice; especially in technology and emerging companies; can be compared to Wilson Sonsini on the West Coast
- Holland & Knight: not sure
- foley hoag: not sure
- Choate: not sure
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
Anonymous User wrote:- Ropes: top corporate practice in Boston; great PE, technology, life sciences, and IP practices; quality of corporate work comparable to NYC V10
- Wilmer: great litigation practice; weaker corporate practice
- Goodwin: great corporate practice; especially in technology and emerging companies; can be compared to Wilson Sonsini on the West Coast
- Holland & Knight: not sure
- Foley Hoag: not sure
- Choate: not sure
Sooo you conveniently know very vague info on the big three yet nothing about other reputable firms in the city? Methinks you know nothing.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
I know as much about the big three as anyone who has not worked there. Did initial and callbacks with big three (only bid these). Seriously considered these, but ended up choosing NYC V5.Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:- Ropes: top corporate practice in Boston; great PE, technology, life sciences, and IP practices; quality of corporate work comparable to NYC V10
- Wilmer: great litigation practice; weaker corporate practice
- Goodwin: great corporate practice; especially in technology and emerging companies; can be compared to Wilson Sonsini on the West Coast
- Holland & Knight: not sure
- Foley Hoag: not sure
- Choate: not sure
Sooo you conveniently know very vague info on the big three yet nothing about other reputable firms in the city? Methinks you know nothing.
- AlanShore
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 4:21 pm
Re: Lets Talk Boston
-Ropes - transactional IP is best but obvi still good at litAnonymous User wrote:BUMP.
Namely, thoughts on:
- Ropes
- Wilmer
- Goodwin
- Holland & Knight
- Foley Hoag.
- Choate
??
-Wilmer - lit powerhouse
-Goodwin - emerging technologies and real estate practice groups are well known, good tax dept, pretty well rounded
-Choate - strong private equity group, govt enforcement (lit) group and IP, also a really strong Wealth Mgmt practice group (bought out wilmer's a few yrs ago) and wealth mgmt groups are rare these days
-h&k - honestly dont know but i know they have a weird "syndicate" group that does some weird tax stuff but they are one of the only firms around who do it so they get a lot of business
-foley - i just know people seem happy here
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
Anyone know Fish & Richardson's rep in the Boston area? (Yes, I know they are IP-only).
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CicerBRo
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2014 5:42 pm
Re: Lets Talk Boston
NYC has more flexibility to lateral to other markets.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
True. But I'm wondering, how hard would it be to lateral to NYC or DC coming from a Boston firm at the Ropes/Wilmer lever, if one wanted to do so?CicerBRo wrote:NYC has more flexibility to lateral to other markets.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
Ropes has offices in both cities and the NYC office is almost 300 people. If you wanted to go there, wouldn't just put in a transfer?Anonymous User wrote:True. But I'm wondering, how hard would it be to lateral to NYC or DC coming from a Boston firm at the Ropes/Wilmer lever, if one wanted to do so?CicerBRo wrote:NYC has more flexibility to lateral to other markets.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
I thought going to a different firm was implicit in the term "lateral." So for the purposes of the question, consider, for example, someone who was moving to either of those cities to switch to a smaller firm, or to a firm that does a type of work Ropes/Wilmer doesn't do in any city, or maybe (not endorsing this at all, but still) move to a firm that's more highly ranked than Ropes/Wilmer in that city, i.e. Davis Polk in NY, or Arnold & Porter in DC. Does anyone have a sense of how easy/difficult that might be coming from Boston?Anonymous User wrote:Ropes has offices in both cities and the NYC office is almost 300 people. If you wanted to go there, wouldn't just put in a transfer?Anonymous User wrote:True. But I'm wondering, how hard would it be to lateral to NYC or DC coming from a Boston firm at the Ropes/Wilmer lever, if one wanted to do so?CicerBRo wrote:NYC has more flexibility to lateral to other markets.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
True, I guess what I was thinking was worst case scenario, you transfer to NYC and then lateral.Anonymous User wrote:I thought going to a different firm was implicit in the term "lateral." So for the purposes of the question, consider, for example, someone who was moving to either of those cities to switch to a smaller firm, or to a firm that does a type of work Ropes/Wilmer doesn't do in any city, or maybe (not endorsing this at all, but still) move to a firm that's more highly ranked than Ropes/Wilmer in that city, i.e. Davis Polk in NY, or Arnold & Porter in DC. Does anyone have a sense of how easy/difficult that might be coming from Boston?Anonymous User wrote:Ropes has offices in both cities and the NYC office is almost 300 people. If you wanted to go there, wouldn't just put in a transfer?Anonymous User wrote:True. But I'm wondering, how hard would it be to lateral to NYC or DC coming from a Boston firm at the Ropes/Wilmer lever, if one wanted to do so?CicerBRo wrote:NYC has more flexibility to lateral to other markets.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2015 10:15 pm
Re: Lets Talk Boston
BUMP.
People are generally happy in Boston. It's supposed to be the best semi-major market for QoL.
Anyone have any luck securing any Boston offers pre-OCI/IEP?
People are generally happy in Boston. It's supposed to be the best semi-major market for QoL.
Anyone have any luck securing any Boston offers pre-OCI/IEP?
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
Just outside of top 1/3 at GULC; got dinged by Nutter yesterday. Silence otherwise from mailing.
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
sorry to hear that. had you had an interview/callback, or just mass-mailed?Anonymous User wrote:Just outside of top 1/3 at GULC; got dinged by Nutter yesterday. Silence otherwise from mailing.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
What firms are considered mid-level in Boston?
- Zero99
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 3:56 pm
Re: Lets Talk Boston
Sherin & Lodgin and Riemer Braunstein come to mind, unsure of others.Anonymous User wrote:What firms are considered mid-level in Boston?
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
Just want to note that Riemer does not abide by NALP (sometimes give you only a few days to accept/reject your offer) or pay market ($120). In addition, up until last year, frequently no-offered summers for fit reasons.Zero99 wrote:Sherin & Lodgin and Riemer Braunstein come to mind, unsure of others.Anonymous User wrote:What firms are considered mid-level in Boston?
-
- Posts: 432656
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Lets Talk Boston
twocabins3112 wrote:BUMP.
People are generally happy in Boston. It's supposed to be the best semi-major market for QoL.
Anyone have any luck securing any Boston offers pre-OCI/IEP?
I've gotten flat out rejected from a few places, and am still waiting to hear from the rest. Top 10 school with top 3rd grades and good ties.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login