MoFo McLean vs. DC Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432569
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
MoFo McLean vs. DC
Ahead of OCI next month, any insights on these two offices for corporate work, and specifically, how they compare against each other (e.g. nature of clients, focus, culture, etc.)? Looking to do corporate work in the DC area, but not sure which office to target. Thanks!
-
Nat Sherman
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: MoFo McLean vs. DC
Just go look at the profiles of the associates. Pretty sure the NOVA office is mostly IP. Looking at a few profiles, most either have a hard science, a soft IP interest or something of value like a Federal Claims Clerkship, or was hired pre 2000 when IP wasn't as big as it is now.
-
bdubs
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: MoFo McLean vs. DC
A general rule is that DC is not a good place to be for corporate. But a few of the firms have OK corporate practices in the area. The powerhouse in DC for corp. is Latham. Chambers also has Hogan, GDC, Kirkland, and Skadden in band 1. MoFo is band 4.
http://www.chambersandpartners.com/1224 ... dFirms_Tab
http://www.chambersandpartners.com/1224 ... dFirms_Tab
