IP Law for Non-Science Background Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
BrokenMouse

- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm
IP Law for Non-Science Background
lol
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- bulinus

- Posts: 199
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:32 pm
Re: IP Law for Non-Science Background
Well, are there reasons for that desire that you can enumerate?BrokenMouse wrote: I always wanted C/T work but just never had the opportunity to do so.
-
BrokenMouse

- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm
Re: IP Law for Non-Science Background
lol
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- bulinus

- Posts: 199
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:32 pm
Re: IP Law for Non-Science Background
I'm not seeing what compsci or working in an internet cafe have to do with copyright or trademarks.
-
BrokenMouse

- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Fri May 16, 2014 1:14 pm
Re: IP Law for Non-Science Background
lol
Last edited by BrokenMouse on Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bulinus

- Posts: 199
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:32 pm
Re: IP Law for Non-Science Background
And this particular employer has a huge book of business from software/tech clients?
-
skri65

- Posts: 484
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm
Re: IP Law for Non-Science Background
Respectfully, do you know what Trademarks are? It seems as though you are drawing a special connection between computer science and trademarks that doesn't exist. If you were talking about patent law, your interest in computer technology would be relevant.BrokenMouse wrote:It's to demonstrate my understanding of computer technology, which is the related area I want to work in.bulinus wrote:I'm not seeing what compsci or working in an internet cafe have to do with copyright or trademarks.
- glitched

- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am
Re: IP Law for Non-Science Background
Sign up for copyright or trademark classes now. You can say that you planned on signing up for them from the beginning but wanted to save non-doctrinal classes for 3L. Then say that you were following the recent Aero case closely, and find similar issues to be interesting (maybe give your opinion if so inclined).
I am literally making this stuff up as I go.
I am literally making this stuff up as I go.
-
InTheHouse

- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2014 8:52 am
Re: IP Law for Non-Science Background
Learning about what copyright and trademark work actually involve would be a huge help (if I find the threads on soft IP here, I'll link them).BrokenMouse wrote:I can certainly explain my interest in computer science and programming growing up, plans to take several IP/Trademark related classes in my 3L year, and my interest and excitement with new technology in general, but quite frankly I do not have any legal work related to C/T other than having worked at an internet cafe after high school. Is there a way to come across as genuinely interested in IP law without sounding like a total BSer who just wants a cool job?bulinus wrote:Well, are there reasons for that desire that you can enumerate?BrokenMouse wrote: I always wanted C/T work but just never had the opportunity to do so.
- gk101

- Posts: 3854
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 6:22 pm
Re: IP Law for Non-Science Background
Yeah none of this will do anything. Stop making up stuffglitched wrote:Sign up for copyright or trademark classes now. You can say that you planned on signing up for them from the beginning but wanted to save non-doctrinal classes for 3L. Then say that you were following the recent Aero case closely, and find similar issues to be interesting (maybe give your opinion if so inclined).
I am literally making this stuff up as I go.
- gk101

- Posts: 3854
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 6:22 pm
Re: IP Law for Non-Science Background
This is probably your best bet. Find out what kind of work this employer does. Try to tailor your background to specific work that the client has. Not sure how you would go about doing that (maybe speak to another associate at the firm?) Filing and prosecuting trademark apps (never do this -- worst career decision you can make) is very different than opposition/licensing practice and a class in trademarks / copyrights will not prepare you to talk intelligently about either of them.bulinus wrote:And this particular employer has a huge book of business from software/tech clients?
-
FSK

- Posts: 8058
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:47 pm
Re: IP Law for Non-Science Background
Oh shit I work at a Copyright & trademark boutique, as a summer. I actually know something. Everyone hear has a background in arts/media/journalism. All went to Top 20 schools & did fairly well.
You can find work doing trademark litigation and technology transactions. No one makes money off copyright/trademark prosecution. If you go to a very top school & do very very well, you can sometimes weasel into patent lit.
You can find work doing trademark litigation and technology transactions. No one makes money off copyright/trademark prosecution. If you go to a very top school & do very very well, you can sometimes weasel into patent lit.
Last edited by FSK on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432826
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: IP Law for Non-Science Background
2L here, can you elaborate a bit? I'm looking to get into copyright and trademark litigation, but I'm afraid in interviews of showing a desire to get into IP without a science background. Note: also worked at a boutique firm doing lots of trademark stuff.flawschoolkid wrote:Oh shit I work at a Copyright & trademark boutique, as a summer. I actually know something. Everyone hear has a background in arts/media/journalism. All went to Top 20 schools & did fairly well.
You can find work doing trademark litigation and technology transactions. No one makes money off copyright/trademark prosecution. If you go to a very top school & do very very well, you can sometimes weasel into patent lit.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432826
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: IP Law for Non-Science Background
This is relevant to my interestsAnonymous User wrote:2L here, can you elaborate a bit? I'm looking to get into copyright and trademark litigation, but I'm afraid in interviews of showing a desire to get into IP without a science background. Note: also worked at a boutique firm doing lots of trademark stuff.flawschoolkid wrote:Oh shit I work at a Copyright & trademark boutique, as a summer. I actually know something. Everyone hear has a background in arts/media/journalism. All went to Top 20 schools & did fairly well.
You can find work doing trademark litigation and technology transactions. No one makes money off copyright/trademark prosecution. If you go to a very top school & do very very well, you can sometimes weasel into patent lit.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login