Law Review for Transactional Work Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Law Review for Transactional Work
Lower T14, looked through some threads and can't find an answer to this. So outside of accepting law review because of its boost, does it push you as a candidate/your resume toward litigation? Might be a stupid question, but am curious if it's strange to have LR then saying you want to do corporate work. I think a few 3Ls at my school said before that for corporate work nobody even gives a shit if you get on any journal.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Review for Transactional Work
At my firm, it's a huge deal to get LR for corporate work, and we won't even look at you from a lower ranked school without it. Everyone understands it's just a prestige badge, but it counts anyways.
-
- Posts: 432653
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Law Review for Transactional Work
It doesn't really push you in any direction, in my experience. I think it's a boost regardless of whether you want corporate or not; firms don't differentiate you very finely when you're interviewing as a 2L.Anonymous User wrote:Lower T14, looked through some threads and can't find an answer to this. So outside of accepting law review because of its boost, does it push you as a candidate/your resume toward litigation? Might be a stupid question, but am curious if it's strange to have LR then saying you want to do corporate work. I think a few 3Ls at my school said before that for corporate work nobody even gives a shit if you get on any journal.
- hichvichwoh
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:21 am
Re: Law Review for Transactional Work
yeah general consensus is law review means: "I am willing to do hours of inane shit work just to prove I can do inane shit work," which is valuable to law firms for litigation or corporate.
-
- Posts: 12612
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am
Re: Law Review for Transactional Work
It's not like it's gonna hurt.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: Law Review for Transactional Work
Corporate work is all about being a coma jockey
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Law Review for Transactional Work
That is possibly your best typo EVER.
-
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:03 pm
Re: Law Review for Transactional Work
Not really sure why Law review would signal litigation..corporate has writing too. Now moot court, THAT signals litigation. don't worry about it. LR you can actually milk towards both sides.
-
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:24 pm
Re: Law Review for Transactional Work
Unless moot court is all appellate shit that litigators won't do anywayAnonymous User wrote:Not really sure why Law review would signal litigation..corporate has writing too. Now moot court, THAT signals litigation. don't worry about it. LR you can actually milk towards both sides.
- mephistopheles
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:43 am
Re: Law Review for Transactional Work
it's a box check, so it can help get callbacks
but, goddamn it's a waste of time and will never help you in corporate. and many associates have said it's not worth it. and i know of a couple of people who pulled top transactional sas without it. and their grades were not top 20%
but, goddamn it's a waste of time and will never help you in corporate. and many associates have said it's not worth it. and i know of a couple of people who pulled top transactional sas without it. and their grades were not top 20%
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Law Review for Transactional Work
Yup.mephistopheles wrote:it's a box check, so it can help get callbacks
but, goddamn it's a waste of time and will never help you in corporate. and many associates have said it's not worth it. and i know of a couple of people who pulled top transactional sas without it. and their grades were not top 20%
Also, LOVE people who clerk and then go into corporate. It's like we are paying associates on a second year pay scale for summer associate skills.
- mephistopheles
- Posts: 1936
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:43 am
Re: Law Review for Transactional Work
familiar with corporate?mcs268 wrote:Not really sure why Law review would signal litigation..corporate has writing too.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login