Law Review for Transactional Work Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Law Review for Transactional Work

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jul 12, 2014 11:41 pm

Lower T14, looked through some threads and can't find an answer to this. So outside of accepting law review because of its boost, does it push you as a candidate/your resume toward litigation? Might be a stupid question, but am curious if it's strange to have LR then saying you want to do corporate work. I think a few 3Ls at my school said before that for corporate work nobody even gives a shit if you get on any journal.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Law Review for Transactional Work

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jul 12, 2014 11:51 pm

At my firm, it's a huge deal to get LR for corporate work, and we won't even look at you from a lower ranked school without it. Everyone understands it's just a prestige badge, but it counts anyways.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432653
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Law Review for Transactional Work

Post by Anonymous User » Sat Jul 12, 2014 11:59 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Lower T14, looked through some threads and can't find an answer to this. So outside of accepting law review because of its boost, does it push you as a candidate/your resume toward litigation? Might be a stupid question, but am curious if it's strange to have LR then saying you want to do corporate work. I think a few 3Ls at my school said before that for corporate work nobody even gives a shit if you get on any journal.
It doesn't really push you in any direction, in my experience. I think it's a boost regardless of whether you want corporate or not; firms don't differentiate you very finely when you're interviewing as a 2L.

User avatar
hichvichwoh

Bronze
Posts: 443
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:21 am

Re: Law Review for Transactional Work

Post by hichvichwoh » Sun Jul 13, 2014 12:06 am

yeah general consensus is law review means: "I am willing to do hours of inane shit work just to prove I can do inane shit work," which is valuable to law firms for litigation or corporate.

Mal Reynolds

Diamond
Posts: 12612
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:16 am

Re: Law Review for Transactional Work

Post by Mal Reynolds » Sun Jul 13, 2014 12:13 am

It's not like it's gonna hurt.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


09042014

Diamond
Posts: 18203
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: Law Review for Transactional Work

Post by 09042014 » Sun Jul 13, 2014 2:26 am

Corporate work is all about being a coma jockey

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse

Diamond
Posts: 29293
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Law Review for Transactional Work

Post by A. Nony Mouse » Sun Jul 13, 2014 3:09 am

That is possibly your best typo EVER.

mcs268

Bronze
Posts: 250
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:03 pm

Re: Law Review for Transactional Work

Post by mcs268 » Sun Jul 13, 2014 10:11 am

Not really sure why Law review would signal litigation..corporate has writing too. Now moot court, THAT signals litigation. don't worry about it. LR you can actually milk towards both sides.

Neal Patrick Harris

Bronze
Posts: 240
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 3:24 pm

Re: Law Review for Transactional Work

Post by Neal Patrick Harris » Sun Jul 13, 2014 10:21 am

Anonymous User wrote:Not really sure why Law review would signal litigation..corporate has writing too. Now moot court, THAT signals litigation. don't worry about it. LR you can actually milk towards both sides.
Unless moot court is all appellate shit that litigators won't do anyway

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
mephistopheles

Gold
Posts: 1936
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:43 am

Re: Law Review for Transactional Work

Post by mephistopheles » Sun Jul 13, 2014 10:49 am

it's a box check, so it can help get callbacks

but, goddamn it's a waste of time and will never help you in corporate. and many associates have said it's not worth it. and i know of a couple of people who pulled top transactional sas without it. and their grades were not top 20%

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: Law Review for Transactional Work

Post by Old Gregg » Sun Jul 13, 2014 12:15 pm

mephistopheles wrote:it's a box check, so it can help get callbacks

but, goddamn it's a waste of time and will never help you in corporate. and many associates have said it's not worth it. and i know of a couple of people who pulled top transactional sas without it. and their grades were not top 20%
Yup.

Also, LOVE people who clerk and then go into corporate. It's like we are paying associates on a second year pay scale for summer associate skills.

User avatar
mephistopheles

Gold
Posts: 1936
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:43 am

Re: Law Review for Transactional Work

Post by mephistopheles » Mon Jul 14, 2014 4:12 am

mcs268 wrote:Not really sure why Law review would signal litigation..corporate has writing too.
familiar with corporate?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”