Finnegan financials Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432827
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Finnegan financials

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Jul 11, 2014 3:34 pm

Hi everybody. I am looking for some clarification from practicing ip attorneys on Finnegan. While the firm is regarded rather highly for the quality of its work, it's financials seem to leave something to be desired. Last year, it experienced a 9% revenue drop and a 15% ppp drop. I have also read about partner and associate departures on ATL. Is this normal attrition/market correction or is there something wrong at the firm? In deciding between finnegan versus a GP firm with strong ip lit and better financials (e.g. K&e, k&l gates, Mayer brown, akin), is the general perception that a candidate would be better off choosing the GP firm at this point? Thanks in advance!

FSK

Platinum
Posts: 8058
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:47 pm

Re: Finnegan financials

Post by FSK » Fri Jul 11, 2014 4:01 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Hi everybody. I am looking for some clarification from practicing ip attorneys on Finnegan. While the firm is regarded rather highly for the quality of its work, it's financials seem to leave something to be desired. Last year, it experienced a 9% revenue drop and a 15% ppp drop. I have also read about partner and associate departures on ATL. Is this normal attrition/market correction or is there something wrong at the firm? In deciding between finnegan versus a GP firm with strong ip lit and better financials (e.g. K&e, k&l gates, Mayer brown, akin), is the general perception that a candidate would be better off choosing the GP firm at this point? Thanks in advance!
I've got a bud over there. He says its busy for associates.
Last edited by FSK on Sat Jan 27, 2018 6:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
filibuster

Bronze
Posts: 118
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:05 pm

Re: Finnegan financials

Post by filibuster » Sat Jul 12, 2014 7:28 pm

Finnegan is fine, shut up about the PPP decrease. Talk to us when/if you have an offer

UMich11

Bronze
Posts: 420
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 8:34 pm

Re: Finnegan financials

Post by UMich11 » Sat Jul 12, 2014 8:41 pm

filibuster wrote:Finnegan is fine, shut up about the PPP decrease. Talk to us when/if you have an offer
this might be a bit too critical of a response IMHO. It's good to worry about these things going in - but don't not bid on them. 1. it's good interview experience especially if you can get them early in the cycle; 2. the above is somewhat right - start worrying about this when you get an offer - you don't want to start the job search again after being a 1st year associate b.c the firm is going under.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432827
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: Finnegan financials

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Jul 16, 2014 12:58 pm

Finnegan isn't going away but from inside sources there is a little bit of a conflict between low margin work like patent prosecution, and high margin work like litigation. Maybe they'll structure their partnership differently, but they are losing partners now because they can't pay them as much as firms w/ pros shop can.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”