LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous User
Posts: 432656
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:19 pm

Is there really much hiring discrepancy between LR and a Secondary?

I have the option of grading onto a Secondary or attempting to write on to LR. I cannot do both. I can attempt to write on to both, but I would risk not making either. I would prefer LR, but I don't know if it's worth the risk of striking out. Any thoughts on what I should do? Will it hurt my OCI chances if I just grade on to a secondary?

tyia

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by kalvano » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:53 pm

There is a big difference between having law review on your resume and only having a secondary journal. How can you be on TLS / in law school and not know that?

However, I think the effect varies by rank of the school.

User avatar
ph14

Gold
Posts: 3227
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by ph14 » Wed Apr 16, 2014 1:54 pm

I would attempt to write on LR and risk missing the secondary journal, personally. You can make up the secondary through moot court and other activities if you end up missing both LR and secondary.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432656
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Apr 16, 2014 2:52 pm

kalvano wrote:There is a big difference between having law review on your resume and only having a secondary journal. How can you be on TLS / in law school and not know that?

However, I think the effect varies by rank of the school.
When you say it varies, does that mean it's more important to be LR as school rank decreases?

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by Old Gregg » Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:24 pm

No one in biglaw cares about secondary journal or moot court.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


mx23250

Silver
Posts: 638
Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 3:44 pm

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by mx23250 » Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:29 pm

zweitbester wrote:No one in biglaw cares about secondary journal or moot court.
I hope you're being sarcastic because that's one of the most ignorant and incorrect statements I've heard on here. Obviously LR<<SJ/MC, but SJ/MC mean A LOT in hiring, especially when deciding among equally qualified candidates.

Anonymous User
Posts: 432656
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:38 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Obviously LR<<SJ/MC, but SJ/MC mean A LOT in hiring, especially when deciding among equally qualified candidates.
So are you saying if I have MC locked up then the SJ is fine? I realize that employers have boxes to check/screen candidates and journal is one of them, but I guess I didn't think there was that big a disparity between SJ and LR.

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by Old Gregg » Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:40 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
zweitbester wrote:No one in biglaw cares about secondary journal or moot court.
I hope you're being sarcastic because that's one of the most ignorant and incorrect statements I've heard on here. Obviously LR<<SJ/MC, but SJ/MC mean A LOT in hiring, especially when deciding among equally qualified candidates.
LOL. No. I interviewed in the worst year ever with decent grades, but nothing crazy, and no journal and still copped that V10 status. I'm in hiring and no one cares from what I can tell.

Moot court is almost absurdly dumb (1) if you want to do corporate or (2) are using it to enhance your hiring prospects. Reason for this is that at most law schools, anyone can do moot court and all the work for it comes after OCI. It's just a useless resume and kind of humorous when I see it (of course, doesn't apply if you did moot court 1L year).

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by Old Gregg » Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:41 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Obviously LR<<SJ/MC, but SJ/MC mean A LOT in hiring, especially when deciding among equally qualified candidates.
So are you saying if I have MC locked up then the SJ is fine? I realize that employers have boxes to check/screen candidates and journal is one of them, but I guess I didn't think there was that big a disparity between SJ and LR.
There's no such box to check. LR is important, but aside from that don't waste your time unless you want to do either for personal enrichment.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


bk1

Diamond
Posts: 20063
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by bk1 » Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:44 pm

I question whether biglaw really even cares about LR all that much.

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by kalvano » Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:45 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
kalvano wrote:There is a big difference between having law review on your resume and only having a secondary journal. How can you be on TLS / in law school and not know that?

However, I think the effect varies by rank of the school.
When you say it varies, does that mean it's more important to be LR as school rank decreases?
Yes. If you're at Harvard, it's my understanding that being on LR is not super important to get a Biglaw job. It may be for top firms, but if you just want a job, it's fine not to do it. At my school (T50, barely) LR was basically prerequisite to getting a large firm job.

dead head

Bronze
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 2:35 am

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by dead head » Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:48 pm

kalvano wrote:Yes. If you're at Harvard, it's my understanding that being on LR is not super important to get a Biglaw job. It may be for top firms, but if you just want a job, it's fine not to do it. At my school (T50, barely) LR was basically prerequisite to getting a large firm job.
Yeah, but I'm guessing most, if not all, of your LR selection process is grade-based. So to the extent LR is a proxy for class rank, and to the extent you need great grades for biglaw from your school, then LR is an important credential. At schools where LR is largely write-on and more of the class gets biglaw, it's obviously not as important.

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by Old Gregg » Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:50 pm

bk1 wrote:I question whether biglaw really even cares about LR all that much.
For the initial hiring? It's a decent bump.
If your grades are so so it would've gotten you a job in a slightly higher tier, but if your grades are really good it only really makes a difference at the really tippity top firms.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


bk1

Diamond
Posts: 20063
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by bk1 » Wed Apr 16, 2014 3:53 pm

While I agree that secondaries aren't all that meaningful, I do think there is a risk that if OP doesn't have anything that the emptyish resume will come off as lazy.
zweitbester wrote:
bk1 wrote:I question whether biglaw really even cares about LR all that much.
For the initial hiring? It's a decent bump.
If your grades are so so it would've gotten you a job in a slightly higher tier, but if your grades are really good it only really makes a difference at the really tippity top firms.
Fair.

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by kalvano » Wed Apr 16, 2014 4:24 pm

dead head wrote:
kalvano wrote:Yes. If you're at Harvard, it's my understanding that being on LR is not super important to get a Biglaw job. It may be for top firms, but if you just want a job, it's fine not to do it. At my school (T50, barely) LR was basically prerequisite to getting a large firm job.
Yeah, but I'm guessing most, if not all, of your LR selection process is grade-based. So to the extent LR is a proxy for class rank, and to the extent you need great grades for biglaw from your school, then LR is an important credential. At schools where LR is largely write-on and more of the class gets biglaw, it's obviously not as important.
Isn't that pretty much what I said? I have no idea what school the OP goes to, so the default answer is "yes, LR matters a lot more than a secondary."

Anonymous User
Posts: 432656
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by Anonymous User » Wed Apr 16, 2014 4:26 pm

dead head wrote:
kalvano wrote:Yes. If you're at Harvard, it's my understanding that being on LR is not super important to get a Biglaw job. It may be for top firms, but if you just want a job, it's fine not to do it. At my school (T50, barely) LR was basically prerequisite to getting a large firm job.
Yeah, but I'm guessing most, if not all, of your LR selection process is grade-based. So to the extent LR is a proxy for class rank, and to the extent you need great grades for biglaw from your school, then LR is an important credential. At schools where LR is largely write-on and more of the class gets biglaw, it's obviously not as important.
There is no strict grade-on for our LR and way less than half of the consideration is based on grades. Which seems stupid since secondary allows grade-on.
kalvano wrote:Yes. If you're at Harvard, it's my understanding that being on LR is not super important to get a Biglaw job. It may be for top firms, but if you just want a job, it's fine not to do it. At my school (T50, barely) LR was basically prerequisite to getting a large firm job.
My school is in the 80ish range but i'm not sure about whether LR correlates to biglaw here. I know very few ppl with 2L SAs or 3Ls with biglaw offers, but I know 3 or 4 were on the SJ. I don't know if the numbers are better for LR but not many ppl openly discuss their jobs here.
bk1 wrote:While I agree that secondaries aren't all that meaningful, I do think there is a risk that if OP doesn't have anything that the emptyish resume will come off as lazy.
My resume is ok (I think) so I'm less worried about it being full and more focused on whether there will be a noticeable discrepancy in hiring between a SJ vs. LR candidate.

dead head

Bronze
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 2:35 am

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by dead head » Wed Apr 16, 2014 4:31 pm

kalvano wrote:
dead head wrote:
kalvano wrote:Yes. If you're at Harvard, it's my understanding that being on LR is not super important to get a Biglaw job. It may be for top firms, but if you just want a job, it's fine not to do it. At my school (T50, barely) LR was basically prerequisite to getting a large firm job.
Yeah, but I'm guessing most, if not all, of your LR selection process is grade-based. So to the extent LR is a proxy for class rank, and to the extent you need great grades for biglaw from your school, then LR is an important credential. At schools where LR is largely write-on and more of the class gets biglaw, it's obviously not as important.
Isn't that pretty much what I said? I have no idea what school the OP goes to, so the default answer is "yes, LR matters a lot more than a secondary."
I must have missed the part where you said your LR is grade-on. Probably a reason for that.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
hichvichwoh

Bronze
Posts: 443
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 11:21 am

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by hichvichwoh » Wed Apr 16, 2014 4:34 pm

zweitbester wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Obviously LR<<SJ/MC, but SJ/MC mean A LOT in hiring, especially when deciding among equally qualified candidates.
So are you saying if I have MC locked up then the SJ is fine? I realize that employers have boxes to check/screen candidates and journal is one of them, but I guess I didn't think there was that big a disparity between SJ and LR.
There's no such box to check. LR is important, but aside from that don't waste your time unless you want to do either for personal enrichment.
how universal do you think this is? when I was at OCI, one interviewer said "well, I can check off that box," looked down at her clipboard, and literally checked off a box after asking me about journal.

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by kalvano » Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:51 pm

dead head wrote:
kalvano wrote:
dead head wrote:
kalvano wrote:Yes. If you're at Harvard, it's my understanding that being on LR is not super important to get a Biglaw job. It may be for top firms, but if you just want a job, it's fine not to do it. At my school (T50, barely) LR was basically prerequisite to getting a large firm job.
Yeah, but I'm guessing most, if not all, of your LR selection process is grade-based. So to the extent LR is a proxy for class rank, and to the extent you need great grades for biglaw from your school, then LR is an important credential. At schools where LR is largely write-on and more of the class gets biglaw, it's obviously not as important.
Isn't that pretty much what I said? I have no idea what school the OP goes to, so the default answer is "yes, LR matters a lot more than a secondary."
I must have missed the part where you said your LR is grade-on. Probably a reason for that.
I didn't say it was grade-on because it isn't. You can grade on or write on. The difference is still meaningless.

rad lulz

Platinum
Posts: 9807
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by rad lulz » Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:54 pm

.
Last edited by rad lulz on Thu Sep 01, 2016 7:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

dead head

Bronze
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 2:35 am

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by dead head » Wed Apr 16, 2014 7:57 pm

kalvano wrote:
dead head wrote:
kalvano wrote: Isn't that pretty much what I said? I have no idea what school the OP goes to, so the default answer is "yes, LR matters a lot more than a secondary."
I must have missed the part where you said your LR is grade-on. Probably a reason for that.
I didn't say it was grade-on because it isn't. You can grade on or write on. The difference is still meaningless.
Then what I said isn't pretty much what you said (unless it's really only those who graded on who have any shot).

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by kalvano » Wed Apr 16, 2014 11:01 pm

dead head wrote:
kalvano wrote:
dead head wrote:
kalvano wrote: Isn't that pretty much what I said? I have no idea what school the OP goes to, so the default answer is "yes, LR matters a lot more than a secondary."
I must have missed the part where you said your LR is grade-on. Probably a reason for that.
I didn't say it was grade-on because it isn't. You can grade on or write on. The difference is still meaningless.
Then what I said isn't pretty much what you said (unless it's really only those who graded on who have any shot).

You're missing the point. Grade on or not, doesn't matter. LR at my school was a big boost to employment prospects. At higher ranked schools, it doesn't matter as much. Secondary journals were next to worthless.

dead head

Bronze
Posts: 197
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 2:35 am

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by dead head » Thu Apr 17, 2014 1:59 am

kalvano wrote: You're missing the point. Grade on or not, doesn't matter. LR at my school was a big boost to employment prospects. At higher ranked schools, it doesn't matter as much. Secondary journals were next to worthless.
And you're missing my point: unless you have people who had the grades to grade on but didn't join LR to compare to those who graded on and took the position, then you don't know if it's really the grades speaking or whether the LR position contributed.

User avatar
twenty 8

Bronze
Posts: 330
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 12:45 pm

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by twenty 8 » Thu Apr 17, 2014 2:09 am

If you have LR/Journal the firm will note it on your firm bio page. If you don’t have it, they’ll write something else about you.

User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: LR vs. Secondary Journal for Biglaw Hiring

Post by kalvano » Thu Apr 17, 2014 9:23 am

dead head wrote:
kalvano wrote: You're missing the point. Grade on or not, doesn't matter. LR at my school was a big boost to employment prospects. At higher ranked schools, it doesn't matter as much. Secondary journals were next to worthless.
And you're missing my point: unless you have people who had the grades to grade on but didn't join LR to compare to those who graded on and took the position, then you don't know if it's really the grades speaking or whether the LR position contributed.

Jesus fucking Christ. Yes, I do know people who did not do the LR write-on who would have almost certainly made LR if they did, and they were not as successful as people who had LR but (slightly) worse grades. I thought that was implicit in my post, but apparently not. In other words, like I said, LR at my school was a boost to employment. Like I would imagine it would be at most non-T14 schools, since your school name won't carry you as far.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”