MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 420
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 8:34 pm
MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law
I'm not a JD/MBA student, just JD, but thinking of taking upper level MBA courses in Accounting, Finance, PEG/VC, and M&A rather than the LS classes. (except i will take M&A and negotiation in the law school as well.)
Will law firms question these types of classes? I'd like to go into the corporate practice area, specifically corporate finance, M&A, and/or PEG/VC practice groups. I come from an IBanking (PEG/VC financing and M&A) background (3 years experience) but i've never received formal finance/accounting training so I want to get a better understanding. Frankly my view is the Law School ones aren't sophisticated enough based on what I would like to get out of it all. - I'm a rising 2L btw.
Will law firms question these types of classes? I'd like to go into the corporate practice area, specifically corporate finance, M&A, and/or PEG/VC practice groups. I come from an IBanking (PEG/VC financing and M&A) background (3 years experience) but i've never received formal finance/accounting training so I want to get a better understanding. Frankly my view is the Law School ones aren't sophisticated enough based on what I would like to get out of it all. - I'm a rising 2L btw.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law
No one will care.UMich11 wrote:I'm not a JD/MBA student, just JD, but thinking of taking upper level MBA courses in Accounting, Finance, PEG/VC, and M&A rather than the LS classes. (except i will take M&A and negotiation in the law school as well.)
Will law firms question these types of classes? I'd like to go into the corporate practice area, specifically corporate finance, M&A, and/or PEG/VC practice groups. I come from an IBanking (PEG/VC financing and M&A) background (3 years experience) but i've never received formal finance/accounting training so I want to get a better understanding. Frankly my view is the Law School ones aren't sophisticated enough based on what I would like to get out of it all. - I'm a rising 2L btw.
When you're practicing, the stuff will help, though. Go for it.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 7:48 pm
Re: MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law
Taking those courses may help demonstrate a genuine interest in the practice area. Firms really do care about that.
- patrickd139
- Posts: 2883
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:53 pm
Re: MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law
To the extent you're already qualified for these jobs with your JD, this is correct.joblawl wrote:Taking those courses may help demonstrate a genuine interest in the practice area. Firms really do care about that.
Enrolling in TTT Law School and then cross-registering with the TTT B-school finance courses is not going to be your gateway to Wachtell, though.
- ChardPennington
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 9:18 pm
Re: MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law
TCR. I took as many of those classes as I could and in practice they seem to be useful things to know.zweitbester wrote:No one will care.UMich11 wrote:I'm not a JD/MBA student, just JD, but thinking of taking upper level MBA courses in Accounting, Finance, PEG/VC, and M&A rather than the LS classes. (except i will take M&A and negotiation in the law school as well.)
Will law firms question these types of classes? I'd like to go into the corporate practice area, specifically corporate finance, M&A, and/or PEG/VC practice groups. I come from an IBanking (PEG/VC financing and M&A) background (3 years experience) but i've never received formal finance/accounting training so I want to get a better understanding. Frankly my view is the Law School ones aren't sophisticated enough based on what I would like to get out of it all. - I'm a rising 2L btw.
When you're practicing, the stuff will help, though. Go for it.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432007
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law
Def take of accounting and finance classes. A former top partner from Kirkland's corporate said that he was big on those, and recommended taking as many as possible while in law school. Imagine there are partners in every firm that think this--people entering into corporate with absolutely no background or understanding in accounting and finance are probably a pain to get caught up to speed.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:21 am
Re: MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law
Accounting is one of the most useful knowledge bases/skills you can have if you're a lawyer, even non-tax related corporate.