MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
UMich11

Bronze
Posts: 420
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 8:34 pm

MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law

Post by UMich11 » Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:19 am

I'm not a JD/MBA student, just JD, but thinking of taking upper level MBA courses in Accounting, Finance, PEG/VC, and M&A rather than the LS classes. (except i will take M&A and negotiation in the law school as well.)

Will law firms question these types of classes? I'd like to go into the corporate practice area, specifically corporate finance, M&A, and/or PEG/VC practice groups. I come from an IBanking (PEG/VC financing and M&A) background (3 years experience) but i've never received formal finance/accounting training so I want to get a better understanding. Frankly my view is the Law School ones aren't sophisticated enough based on what I would like to get out of it all. - I'm a rising 2L btw.

User avatar
Old Gregg

Platinum
Posts: 5409
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm

Re: MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law

Post by Old Gregg » Mon Apr 14, 2014 12:53 am

UMich11 wrote:I'm not a JD/MBA student, just JD, but thinking of taking upper level MBA courses in Accounting, Finance, PEG/VC, and M&A rather than the LS classes. (except i will take M&A and negotiation in the law school as well.)

Will law firms question these types of classes? I'd like to go into the corporate practice area, specifically corporate finance, M&A, and/or PEG/VC practice groups. I come from an IBanking (PEG/VC financing and M&A) background (3 years experience) but i've never received formal finance/accounting training so I want to get a better understanding. Frankly my view is the Law School ones aren't sophisticated enough based on what I would like to get out of it all. - I'm a rising 2L btw.
No one will care.

When you're practicing, the stuff will help, though. Go for it.

joblawl

New
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 7:48 pm

Re: MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law

Post by joblawl » Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:28 am

Taking those courses may help demonstrate a genuine interest in the practice area. Firms really do care about that.

User avatar
patrickd139

Gold
Posts: 2883
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:53 pm

Re: MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law

Post by patrickd139 » Mon Apr 14, 2014 8:04 am

joblawl wrote:Taking those courses may help demonstrate a genuine interest in the practice area. Firms really do care about that.
To the extent you're already qualified for these jobs with your JD, this is correct.

Enrolling in TTT Law School and then cross-registering with the TTT B-school finance courses is not going to be your gateway to Wachtell, though.

User avatar
ChardPennington

Silver
Posts: 789
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2010 9:18 pm

Re: MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law

Post by ChardPennington » Mon Apr 14, 2014 6:47 pm

zweitbester wrote:
UMich11 wrote:I'm not a JD/MBA student, just JD, but thinking of taking upper level MBA courses in Accounting, Finance, PEG/VC, and M&A rather than the LS classes. (except i will take M&A and negotiation in the law school as well.)

Will law firms question these types of classes? I'd like to go into the corporate practice area, specifically corporate finance, M&A, and/or PEG/VC practice groups. I come from an IBanking (PEG/VC financing and M&A) background (3 years experience) but i've never received formal finance/accounting training so I want to get a better understanding. Frankly my view is the Law School ones aren't sophisticated enough based on what I would like to get out of it all. - I'm a rising 2L btw.
No one will care.

When you're practicing, the stuff will help, though. Go for it.
TCR. I took as many of those classes as I could and in practice they seem to be useful things to know.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 432007
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law

Post by Anonymous User » Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:43 pm

Def take of accounting and finance classes. A former top partner from Kirkland's corporate said that he was big on those, and recommended taking as many as possible while in law school. Imagine there are partners in every firm that think this--people entering into corporate with absolutely no background or understanding in accounting and finance are probably a pain to get caught up to speed.

remainsofthebay

New
Posts: 22
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:21 am

Re: MBA courses v. Law courses for Corporate law

Post by remainsofthebay » Sat Apr 19, 2014 6:33 pm

Accounting is one of the most useful knowledge bases/skills you can have if you're a lawyer, even non-tax related corporate.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”