Rejection letters for 1LSAs: worthless or slightly less than Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
User avatar
bulinus

Bronze
Posts: 199
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:32 pm

Rejection letters for 1LSAs: worthless or slightly less than

Post by bulinus » Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:57 am

So of the handful of places that have bothered to mail or email me, "Thanks, but we're good" letters have also indicated that I should apply for a 2015 SA. Is this boilerplate language, or an indication that I might be competitive for their bigger 2L program?

User avatar
soj

Platinum
Posts: 7888
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: Rejection letters for 1LSAs: worthless or slightly less than

Post by soj » Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:59 am

boilerplate

User avatar
AntipodeanPhil

Silver
Posts: 1352
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:02 pm

Re: Rejection letters for 1LSAs: worthless or slightly less than

Post by AntipodeanPhil » Tue Feb 25, 2014 2:51 am

It can be a bit confusing, especially because a lot of the firms will make statements describing you or your application in very positive terms in their rejection letters. But, as mentioned above, they send the same letter to everyone. Apparently every single person who applies has "excellent credentials," etc.

But, that doesn't mean they treat everyone the same. A lucky few will get two rejection letters from the same firm. Sometimes they don't spell you're name correctly, just to mix it up. And, if you're really special, you'll get a letter addressed to "[Insert Name Here]."

User avatar
2014

Platinum
Posts: 6028
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm

Re: Rejection letters for 1LSAs: worthless or slightly less than

Post by 2014 » Tue Feb 25, 2014 10:53 am

I was rejected across the board when come pre-2L summer I re-mass mailed those firms that had sent me 1L rejection letters. Anecdotal but still strong evidence it's just boilerplate.

Danger Zone

Platinum
Posts: 8258
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:36 am

Re: Rejection letters for 1LSAs: worthless or slightly less than

Post by Danger Zone » Tue Feb 25, 2014 11:18 am

AntipodeanPhil wrote:It can be a bit confusing, especially because a lot of the firms will make statements describing you or your application in very positive terms in their rejection letters. But, as mentioned above, they send the same letter to everyone. Apparently every single person who applies has "excellent credentials," etc.

But, that doesn't mean they treat everyone the same. A lucky few will get two rejection letters from the same firm. Sometimes they don't spell you're name correctly, just to mix it up. And, if you're really special, you'll get a letter addressed to "[Insert Name Here]."
Don't forget the always fun "letter is dated as the day before your interview"!

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
AntipodeanPhil

Silver
Posts: 1352
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:02 pm

Re: Rejection letters for 1LSAs: worthless or slightly less than

Post by AntipodeanPhil » Wed Feb 26, 2014 2:20 am

Danger Zone wrote:Don't forget the always fun "letter is dated as the day before your interview"!
Of course - that's one of my favorites. I like it because it keeps you guessing - did they really reject me before meeting me, or was it just that they couldn't be bothered changing the date on the last letter they sent?

User avatar
downinDtown

Bronze
Posts: 203
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 12:01 pm

Re: Rejection letters for 1LSAs: worthless or slightly less than

Post by downinDtown » Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:55 am

bulinus wrote:So of the handful of places that have bothered to mail or email me, "Thanks, but we're good" letters have also indicated that I should apply for a 2015 SA. Is this boilerplate language, or an indication that I might be competitive for their bigger 2L program?
I had quite the collection. A library you could call it. Most say the exact same thing, including that you should apply next year. That's the way they let you down softly: they give you a pillowed landing spot right before they push you off the ledge.

But a few do say something to the effect of, "if you're in the area over the summer, we'd love to meet with you." Those you could take advantage of, as it could give you a headstart in OCI. Or if you butcher it or end up not liking the firm, you save yourself that time later to bid/interview with other firms.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”