NLJ 250 numbers out Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
NLJ 250 numbers out
Last edited by Tiago Splitter on Sat Feb 22, 2014 1:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out, behind paywall
1) CLS 65.45%
2) NYU 54.93%
3) HLS 53.55%
4) Chicago 53.02%
5) UPenn State 52.51%
6) NU 41.04%
7) Dook 48.55%
Stanford 47.09%
9) Cornell 45.08%
10) Boalt 44.85%
11) UVA 44.23%
12) UMaa 41.25%
13) Yale 38.83%
14) Gtwon 31.75%
2) NYU 54.93%
3) HLS 53.55%
4) Chicago 53.02%
5) UPenn State 52.51%
6) NU 41.04%
7) Dook 48.55%

9) Cornell 45.08%
10) Boalt 44.85%
11) UVA 44.23%
12) UMaa 41.25%
13) Yale 38.83%
14) Gtwon 31.75%
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out, behind paywall
Aw come on, don't tease...post the rest of the t30
Didn't mean to anon. You can out me
Didn't mean to anon. You can out me
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out, behind paywall
Page 2?Anonymous User wrote:Aw come on, don't tease...post the rest of the t30
No just kidding. I have zero energy or desire to do so.
-
- Posts: 432595
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out, behind paywall
Is that a typo for NU?zweitbester wrote:1) CLS 65.45%
2) NYU 54.93%
3) HLS 53.55%
4) Chicago 53.02%
5) UPenn State 52.51%
6) NU 41.04%
7) Dook 48.55%
Stanford 47.09%
9) Cornell 45.08%
10) Boalt 44.85%
11) UVA 44.23%
12) UMaa 41.25%
13) Yale 38.83%
14) Gtwon 31.75%
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out, behind paywall
Oh snap it's 51.05%.Anonymous User wrote:Is that a typo for NU?zweitbester wrote:1) CLS 65.45%
2) NYU 54.93%
3) HLS 53.55%
4) Chicago 53.02%
5) UPenn State 52.51%
6) NU 41.04%
7) Dook 48.55%
Stanford 47.09%
9) Cornell 45.08%
10) Boalt 44.85%
11) UVA 44.23%
12) UMaa 41.25%
13) Yale 38.83%
14) Gtwon 31.75%
- El Pollito
- Posts: 20139
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out, behind paywall
SECOND PAGE PLEASE
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out, behind paywall
Edit: Just taking this down because apparently it's not free and my account has some sort of glitch that lets me access it.
Last edited by Old Gregg on Sat Feb 22, 2014 1:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:21 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out, behind paywall
Man, Yale is a terrible school.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out, behind paywall
So is your mom.toothbrush wrote:Man, Yale is a terrible school.
- yomisterd
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:52 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out, behind paywall
Especially when another 35% are in Article III clerkships. Come on, Yale. Get your shit together.toothbrush wrote:Man, Yale is a terrible school.
- Bikeflip
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:01 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out, behind paywall
For comparison, last year's numbers:
http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog ... chool.html
Pennsylvania (60.4%)
Chicago (55.1%)
Columbia (53.1%)
NYU (52.9%)
Northwestern (51.4%)
Harvard (50.3%)
Duke (48.4%)
Stanford (47.3%)
UC-Berkeley (45.3%)
Cornell (44.3%)
Virginia (42.3%)
Michigan (38.4%)
Georgetown (31.3%)
Yale (30.6%)
UCLA (29.1%)
USC (28.6%)
Vanderbilt (26.3%)
Texas (25.8%)
Fordham (23.4%)
UC-Irvine (23.2%)
George Washington (22.5%)
Boston University (21.3%)
Boston College (21.1%)
Illinois (18.8%)
Washington University (16.3%)
http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog ... chool.html
Pennsylvania (60.4%)
Chicago (55.1%)
Columbia (53.1%)
NYU (52.9%)
Northwestern (51.4%)
Harvard (50.3%)
Duke (48.4%)
Stanford (47.3%)
UC-Berkeley (45.3%)
Cornell (44.3%)
Virginia (42.3%)
Michigan (38.4%)
Georgetown (31.3%)
Yale (30.6%)
UCLA (29.1%)
USC (28.6%)
Vanderbilt (26.3%)
Texas (25.8%)
Fordham (23.4%)
UC-Irvine (23.2%)
George Washington (22.5%)
Boston University (21.3%)
Boston College (21.1%)
Illinois (18.8%)
Washington University (16.3%)
-
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 2:35 am
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out
Anyone have access to their methodology? Is it simply a scrape of NLJ 250 law-firm lawyer profiles?
OK, got it from LST:
"Methodology: Data for this Go-To Law Schools special report were provided by the law firms surveyed for the NLJ 250, The National Law Journal’s annual survey of the nation’s 250 largest law firms by headcount. For firms that did not submit new associate numbers, we relied on data from ALM Media's RivalEdge database and independent reporting. We determined rankings by the percentage of 2012 juries doctor graduates who took associate jobs at NLJ 250 firms. In all, we have data from 248 firms covering 4,429 graduates. The two missing firms are Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and King & Spalding. The rankings do not reflect law graduates who took clerkships following graduation. "
OK, got it from LST:
"Methodology: Data for this Go-To Law Schools special report were provided by the law firms surveyed for the NLJ 250, The National Law Journal’s annual survey of the nation’s 250 largest law firms by headcount. For firms that did not submit new associate numbers, we relied on data from ALM Media's RivalEdge database and independent reporting. We determined rankings by the percentage of 2012 juries doctor graduates who took associate jobs at NLJ 250 firms. In all, we have data from 248 firms covering 4,429 graduates. The two missing firms are Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and King & Spalding. The rankings do not reflect law graduates who took clerkships following graduation. "
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 84651846190
- Posts: 2198
- Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2012 7:06 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out
looks a lil better than last year, but definitely not by much
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 10:09 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out
Holy cow!
537 JDs from NYU? Are there really THAT many transfers???
537 JDs from NYU? Are there really THAT many transfers???
- Tiago Splitter
- Posts: 17148
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out
This is last year. I imagine they did something similar this year, but the missing firms are probably different. I know that last year they only had info for Davis Polk's Menlo Park office, for example, but given the CLS number it's hard to believe they left out all of Paul Weiss and DPW NYC.dead head wrote:Anyone have access to their methodology? Is it simply a scrape of NLJ 250 law-firm lawyer profiles?
OK, got it from LST:
"Methodology: Data for this Go-To Law Schools special report were provided by the law firms surveyed for the NLJ 250, The National Law Journal’s annual survey of the nation’s 250 largest law firms by headcount. For firms that did not submit new associate numbers, we relied on data from ALM Media's RivalEdge database and independent reporting. We determined rankings by the percentage of 2012 juries doctor graduates who took associate jobs at NLJ 250 firms. In all, we have data from 248 firms covering 4,429 graduates. The two missing firms are Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison and King & Spalding. The rankings do not reflect law graduates who took clerkships following graduation. "
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out
FYI, I don't have a paid subscription for NLJ and I wasn't on my firm's computer when I accessed that, so I don't know if it's really behind a paywall.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out
Don't know how you pulled it off, but it's definitely behind a paywall. Going to have to wait to get the rest of the NLJ 250 numbers.zweitbester wrote:FYI, I don't have a paid subscription for NLJ and I wasn't on my firm's computer when I accessed that, so I don't know if it's really behind a paywall.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out
PSA: If your decision to attend law school hinges on the results of this survey, and you're not deciding between T14s...
DON'T GO TO LAW SCHOOL.
Of course, doesn't mean you should go to law school even if you are deciding between T14s. But, believe me, I'm doing you a favor not posting the rest of the numbers.
DON'T GO TO LAW SCHOOL.
Of course, doesn't mean you should go to law school even if you are deciding between T14s. But, believe me, I'm doing you a favor not posting the rest of the numbers.
-
- Posts: 484
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out
You assume the people wanting to know page 2 aren't already in law school and just want to know the rest of the numbers...in which case we just want to know how screwed we will be by graduation.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out
Nah, I don't assume that. I just think that that desire is dumb and if it's behind a $300 paywall, time to move on to fulfilling other desires.skri65 wrote:You assume the people wanting to know page 2 aren't already in law school and just want to know the rest of the numbers...in which case we just want to know how screwed we will be by graduation.
If someone posts a compelling need for the rest of the numbers, I will post them. I have them all saved to my hard drive either way so it's NBD when NLJ finally figures out how I randomly have access to this stuff.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 10:46 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out
A full picture of the legal employment market is a compelling reason for everybody. Is there a greater bifurcation between T-14 and the rest? Was there small but broad-based rises in employment stats? 0Ls can get another chance to look at the small chances they have at lower ranked schools.
More information the better seems to be a general rule that definitely applies here.
More information the better seems to be a general rule that definitely applies here.
- El Pollito
- Posts: 20139
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 2:11 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out
I just wanted to drop an OperaSoprano meme.skri65 wrote:You assume the people wanting to know page 2 aren't already in law school and just want to know the rest of the numbers...in which case we just want to know how screwed we will be by graduation.
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out
What a bunch of losers. last year all of that was free. The NLJ 250 list, how many people each big firm hired and from what school.. All for free.. I bet their traffic will TANK and no more advertisement money.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: NLJ 250 numbers out
Impossible to determine from the information, since some firms were missing in the prior survey and different firms will be missing from this survey (and, in the methodology, they don't even say which firms are missing anymore). Sorry, I really just don't want to perpetuate a 20 page thread on mindlessly arguing what could possibly explain the numbers. It's a Saturday--go out and have fun.Is there a greater bifurcation between T-14 and the rest? Was there small but broad-based rises in employment stats?
They suck. 7.7% one year versus 7.9% another year doesn't make a difference. And I pulled those numbers out of thin air so don't go off trying to guess which school I'm talking about.0Ls can get another chance to look at the small chances they have at lower ranked schools.
Not when the information sucks.More information the better seems to be a general rule that definitely applies here.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login