Can someone clear this up for me?
If a firm lists its practice as intellectual property, what does that mean? How does that compare to patent litigation?
Also, is that the same as IP transactional?
Intellectual Property law Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432495
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Intellectual Property law
It's an umbrella term. They might do it all (patent prosecution, patent litigation, trademarks, copyright), or they might practice "intellectual property", yet restrict themselves to either patents, trademarks, and/or copyright. In addition, some firms may only focus on certain types of patents, such as biomedical, electrical, computer, or other. Often times the firm will indicate what they specialize in with IP. Other times they will do it all.Anonymous User wrote:Can someone clear this up for me?
If a firm lists its practice as intellectual property, what does that mean? How does that compare to patent litigation?
Also, is that the same as IP transactional?
