Conflicts Question Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432827
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Conflicts Question
Is it a conflict to work for a firm defending Bank A and then later work for a plaintiffs firm that often sues Bank A? Is the inverse a conflict as well?
-
atcushman
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 5:08 pm
Re: Conflicts Question
It would be a conflict. Plaintiffs firm could technically screen you, but in the real world if suing bank A was a large source of their income they likely just wouldn't hire you.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432827
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Conflicts Question
OP: reason why I use the bank example is because it is a more consolidated group of major banks. That's rough.
