N/a
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- brotherdarkness
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 8:11 pm
Re: Completely ambivalent
.
Last edited by brotherdarkness on Thu Mar 27, 2014 11:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 356432
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick
are you seriously considering under market paying firms? (pryor) if so, why?
-
- Posts: 356432
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick
What are your interests?
-
- Posts: 356432
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick
bump. this is relevant to my interests
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:12 pm
Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick
n/a
Last edited by suoicerp on Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 356432
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick
I'm a little surprised about why Orrick isn't getting more love. anyone wanna share thoughts?
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:37 am
Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick
Orrick is great culturally. More chill than most of biglaw for sure.
-
- Posts: 356432
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick
There is something grimy about kasowitz.
-
- Posts: 356432
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick
I summered at Kasowitz. Had a great time, got an offer, etc. I'm not grimy. Place doesn't feel grimy.
Just a good firm that gets high quality work.
Just a good firm that gets high quality work.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:12 pm
Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick
n/a
Last edited by suoicerp on Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 356432
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick
What?suoicerp wrote:Well they are now out of the picture because they called me and told me to accept elsewhere.Anonymous User wrote:I summered at Kasowitz. Had a great time, got an offer, etc. I'm not grimy. Place doesn't feel grimy.
Just a good firm that gets high quality work.
-
- Posts: 356432
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick
Winston should not be picked by anyone who has an alternative option that pays market.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:12 pm
Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick
n/a
Last edited by suoicerp on Tue Sep 17, 2013 9:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:44 am
Re: Kasowitz v Pryor Cashman v Willkie v Winston v Orrick
It's a good sign they warned you. I would strongly suggest people who have offers there to go elsewhere. They may end up having to no offer people if they aren't going to have room for everyone. So smart move on your part.suoicerp wrote:Well they are now out of the picture because they called me and told me to accept elsewhere.Anonymous User wrote:I summered at Kasowitz. Had a great time, got an offer, etc. I'm not grimy. Place doesn't feel grimy.
Just a good firm that gets high quality work.
Of these firms, stay away from Winston; I don't know much other than Wilkie seems like a decent place to work.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Senior Level Tax Attorney
USA-MD-RockvilleMaryland Boutique Tax firm seeks Senior Level Tax Attorney. Want to be part of a special team? Qualifi... read more
-
Associate Attorney
USA-VA-DullesSalary $70,000 - $75,000 a year Job Type Full-time Qualifications Experience: lega... read more
-
Summer Internship
USA-VA-SterlingSummer Internship The intern may be asked to do a variety of things, including day-to-day office work such as... read more