Would appreciate opinions on: STB v. S&C v. Sidley (all NY) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Would appreciate opinions on: STB v. S&C v. Sidley (all NY)
I just finished up all my CBs and am down to choosing between these 3- am struggling to decide and would appreciate feedback on what people consider the best option.
Some info about myself:
I intend to stay in NY long term (not originally from here), am primarily interested in litigation but absolutely want to try transactional work this summer just in case, and while I think Sidley is the best in terms of "fit," I am generally a very easygoing person and found all 3 to have pleasant people that I could see myself working with. I am also going in with the mindset that I want to be on a partner-track, but given how unrealistic that goal is I am also very concerned about optimizing my exit options. Also, a CCN student.
Any advice?
Some info about myself:
I intend to stay in NY long term (not originally from here), am primarily interested in litigation but absolutely want to try transactional work this summer just in case, and while I think Sidley is the best in terms of "fit," I am generally a very easygoing person and found all 3 to have pleasant people that I could see myself working with. I am also going in with the mindset that I want to be on a partner-track, but given how unrealistic that goal is I am also very concerned about optimizing my exit options. Also, a CCN student.
Any advice?
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Would appreciate opinions on: STB v. S&C v. Sidley (all NY)
I loved STB on my callback - Congrats those are all great firms.
Mind sharing when your CB was/when they called with offer?
Mind sharing when your CB was/when they called with offer?
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Would appreciate opinions on: STB v. S&C v. Sidley (all NY)
Thanks! Sidley CB was last week, the other two were this week. S&C offer on the spot, and the other calls both came in Wednesday/Thursday.Anonymous User wrote:I loved STB on my callback - Congrats those are all great firms.
Mind sharing when your CB was/when they called with offer?
- thesealocust
- Posts: 8525
- Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 8:50 pm
Re: Would appreciate opinions on: STB v. S&C v. Sidley (all NY)
Sidley NYC is noticeably less-fancy-pants-prestigious than S&C and STB, which are close enough for government work (at least without some kind of much more narrow desire). I feel like I remember Sidley having economic troubles lately too.
Edit: yeah, I just double checked chambers. I really don't think you should be considering Sidley unless you get bad vibes from S&C/STB or have some other good reason.
Edit: yeah, I just double checked chambers. I really don't think you should be considering Sidley unless you get bad vibes from S&C/STB or have some other good reason.
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Would appreciate opinions on: STB v. S&C v. Sidley (all NY)
The only reason I could think to prefer Sidley would be a future relocation to Chicago, which is unlikely...thanks for the input!thesealocust wrote:Sidley NYC is noticeably less-fancy-pants-prestigious than S&C and STB, which are close enough for government work (at least without some kind of much more narrow desire). I feel like I remember Sidley having economic troubles lately too.
Edit: yeah, I just double checked chambers. I really don't think you should be considering Sidley unless you get bad vibes from S&C/STB or have some other good reason.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Would appreciate opinions on: STB v. S&C v. Sidley (all NY)
S&C is stronger for lit.
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Would appreciate opinions on: STB v. S&C v. Sidley (all NY)
When ever there's a poll about top firms, DPW/STB/Cleary would always get a lot of favorable votes while Cravath/S&C/Skadden would always get dissed.
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Would appreciate opinions on: STB v. S&C v. Sidley (all NY)
Simpson by a mile. Hth
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Would appreciate opinions on: STB v. S&C v. Sidley (all NY)
This reminds me of selecting colleges a few years back. At that time, people on CollegeConfidential always say that Harvard College has a bad culture (i.e. uncaring professors, gunning classmates who study too much), and people should go to Stanford/Yale/Dartmouth instead.Anonymous User wrote:When ever there's a poll about top firms, DPW/STB/Cleary would always get a lot of favorable votes while Cravath/S&C/Skadden would always get dissed.
-
- Posts: 8258
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:36 am
Re: Would appreciate opinions on: STB v. S&C v. Sidley (all NY)
White people problems.Anonymous User wrote:This reminds me of selecting colleges a few years back. At that time, people on CollegeConfidential always say that Harvard College has a bad culture (i.e. uncaring professors, gunning classmates who study too much), and people should go to Stanford/Yale/Dartmouth instead.Anonymous User wrote:When ever there's a poll about top firms, DPW/STB/Cleary would always get a lot of favorable votes while Cravath/S&C/Skadden would always get dissed.
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Would appreciate opinions on: STB v. S&C v. Sidley (all NY)
Any reason for this?Anonymous User wrote:Simpson by a mile. Hth
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login