Simpson Thacher v. Skadden (NY Lit) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432826
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Simpson Thacher v. Skadden (NY Lit)
Interest in litigation, particularly antitrust and white collar. Hoping to end up AUSA or FTC down the line. Liked most people at both offices during CBs and could see working at either firm.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432826
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Simpson Thacher v. Skadden (NY Lit)
How is STB winning this? OP wants lit.Anonymous User wrote:Interest in litigation, particularly antitrust and white collar. Hoping to end up AUSA or FTC down the line. Liked most people at both offices during CBs and could see working at either firm.
-
KidStuddi
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:35 pm
Re: Simpson Thacher v. Skadden (NY Lit)
How many dead threads are you going to revise just to express your shock that people are unimpressed with Skadden (when compared to other V10s)?Anonymous User wrote:How is STB winning this? OP wants lit.Anonymous User wrote:Interest in litigation, particularly antitrust and white collar. Hoping to end up AUSA or FTC down the line. Liked most people at both offices during CBs and could see working at either firm.
