SA — In • Out • ? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- iLaw
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 12:20 pm
SA — In • Out • ?
Looking for a 2013 SA headcount on offered, no offered or still awaiting word.
If you are still awaiting word you can return and change your circumstance when you find out. Also, if you are still waiting, what is the timeline your firm has offered (if they did). Feel free to include comments about your SA adventure (including no offered).
If you are still awaiting word you can return and change your circumstance when you find out. Also, if you are still waiting, what is the timeline your firm has offered (if they did). Feel free to include comments about your SA adventure (including no offered).
-
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
This has the potential to be really useful if people vote. I don't get why so few did.
- Uncle.Joe
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:40 pm
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
How would this be useful?
-
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:59 am
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
Read the title in Heidi Klum's voice.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
SHIT: 26% of those who were told have been no offered. Holy shit, this is a melt down. I guess the Weil and Wilmer layoffs were the warning shots.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
It would be more immediate than the data that is going to be released next May, both in terms of time and because it is not filtered through whatever offices (i.e. recruiting, career services, and the compilers) help compile the official reports. It would have the potential to confirm or call into question the data that the big associations will release. It would likely offer the opportunity to put some relevant information together with the numbers, e.g. if 20 people were no offered and 5-6 of them chime in to explain the circumstances; or if people take the cue from the OP and discuss cold offers, etc.Uncle.Joe wrote:How would this be useful?
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 11:57 pm
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
Could we clarify whether the no offers are 1Ls or 2Ls? At least for me, I'm only interested in whether 2Ls are being no offered... still pending here.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 11:39 pm
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
If a third are still waiting, then I am not alone.
- JusticeHarlan
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
Dude, you're just assuming that all the offers responses are real "offers" and not cold offers. Could be much worse once you assume the normal cold offer distribution.Desert Fox wrote:SHIT: 26% of those who were told have been no offered. Holy shit, this is a melt down. I guess the Weil and Wilmer layoffs were the warning shots.
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
Not sure if serious... but now curious what you think the normal cold offer distribution isJusticeHarlan wrote:Dude, you're just assuming that all the offers responses are real "offers" and not cold offers. Could be much worse once you assume the normal cold offer distribution.Desert Fox wrote:SHIT: 26% of those who were told have been no offered. Holy shit, this is a melt down. I guess the Weil and Wilmer layoffs were the warning shots.
- purpletiger
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2012 9:52 am
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
You don't think there's a selection bias here?Desert Fox wrote:SHIT: 26% of those who were told have been no offered. Holy shit, this is a melt down. I guess the Weil and Wilmer layoffs were the warning shots.
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
Holy shit, I didn't even think of this. This is madness.JusticeHarlan wrote:Dude, you're just assuming that all the offers responses are real "offers" and not cold offers. Could be much worse once you assume the normal cold offer distribution.Desert Fox wrote:SHIT: 26% of those who were told have been no offered. Holy shit, this is a melt down. I guess the Weil and Wilmer layoffs were the warning shots.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:20 pm
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
28% unknown. Wouldn't this be considered high given it is mid-August?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 11:57 pm
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
many schools are doing OCI this week and job fairs etc. have already happened (even though 3L spots are limited). it seems kind of crazy that this many people haven't received a decision about their offer status at this point.
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
jd-mba wrote:many schools are doing OCI this week and job fairs etc. have already happened (even though 3L spots are limited). it seems kind of crazy that this many people haven't received a decision about their offer status at this point.
I'm still waiting. As far as I know, all of the other summers through out offices in my state have heard. It kinda sucks to be the last one waiting. My positive side to this, however, is that I have four interviews next week with comparable biglaw firms. They also are not through OCI, which I'm hoping was a smart move.
I was told I'd hear by last Friday. Is this one of those wait until you either have an offer to accept or until it's September before checking in?
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
The number of no offers here seems shockingly high. A third?? What the fuck.
I get it with the self selection but still...
I get it with the self selection but still...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
ITE is back with a vengeance. Nobody is even talking about how many firms aren't guaranteeing 160k in their offer letters.Anonymous User wrote:The number of no offers here seems shockingly high. A third?? What the fuck.
I get it with the self selection but still...
-
- Posts: 280
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 7:01 am
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
I tend to think that some voters are not being truthful.Desert Fox wrote:ITE is back with a vengeance. Nobody is even talking about how many firms aren't guaranteeing 160k in their offer letters.Anonymous User wrote:The number of no offers here seems shockingly high. A third?? What the fuck.
I get it with the self selection but still...
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
For those wondering why there are so many "still waiting," there are some groups that just haven't met. I know I spoke to an associate a few days ago who told me that they just haven't met yet, they are going to meet at the end of this week, and that I'll hear after that. It would have been nice to hear on the last day like some of the other satellite office's SAs, but better late than never!
- Icculus
- Posts: 1410
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:02 am
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
This thread is not useful at all, and I am a real fan of what DF is doing here. The more useful thread is the 2013 SA Offer thread now that it has been modified to focus on firm and offer rate and is no longer a glorified circle jerk.Uncle.Joe wrote:How would this be useful?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:20 pm
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
I was hopeful that I could exit the waiting game today, BUT NOOO, pushed back until Friday. The hits just keep on comin’.
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
no offered last week. so at least one of those votes is real. fml.
-
- Posts: 432755
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
Offered...But placed in a different office




-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: SA — In • Out • ?
dats cold.Anonymous User wrote:Offered...But placed in a different office![]()
![]()
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login