Current data on clerkship bonuses by firm? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 431109
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Current data on clerkship bonuses by firm?
Any reliable data available?
-
- Posts: 431109
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Current data on clerkship bonuses by firm?
I work at DPW and so happen to know our package is publicly visible: http://www.davispolk.com/careers/associ ... -benefits/
I searched other firms assuming that was standard but didn't see much.
I searched other firms assuming that was standard but didn't see much.
- The McRib Is Risen
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 3:34 pm
Re: Current data on clerkship bonuses by firm?
DPW seems to have a more expansive bonus system than most. Typically I've seen Article III gets the bonus, bankruptcy and magistrate clerks are boned, state supreme court is case-by-case, state lower court is boned, and Canadian court is GTFO.Anonymous User wrote:I work at DPW and so happen to know our package is publicly visible: http://www.davispolk.com/careers/associ ... -benefits/
I searched other firms assuming that was standard but didn't see much.
I guess they figure they're selective enough that any clerk they hire is worth the bonus, which probably makes sense.