Greenberg Traurig or Chadbourne and Parke
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 350859
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Greenberg Traurig or Chadbourne and Parke
Both NY. I am interested primarily in litigation, possibly in real estate, but I am not entirely sure. Looking for people's opinions with regard to anything about these two firms.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 350859
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Greenberg Traurig or Chadbourne and Parke
CP is an easy decision.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 350859
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Greenberg Traurig or Chadbourne and Parke
When did you hear from Greenberg? A giant that is not doing so well is what I have heard about the firm. Additionally, if you look on TLS there is talk about a certain partner that is a notorious meany, but I am willing to bet tons of these stories are exaggerated. Personally, I like Greenberg a lot, knowing a few of their attorneys from non-NYC offices, but I recognize their reputation is not great. Also recent capital call.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 350859
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Greenberg Traurig or Chadbourne and Parke
Go to Chadbourne bro... out of all of my callbacks, GT gave me by far the worst impression.
-
dabbadon8
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 2:17 am
Re: Greenberg Traurig or Chadbourne and Parke
Looking at the Chambers rankings... for your stated interests.
Greenberg: Band 1 General Commercial Litigation: Highly Regarded, Band 1 Real Estate: Mainly Dirt
Chadbourne: Band 3 (same as above), Not ranked in real estate
The partner notorious partner that came over is in M&A. That beings said, fit is more important.
Greenberg: Band 1 General Commercial Litigation: Highly Regarded, Band 1 Real Estate: Mainly Dirt
Chadbourne: Band 3 (same as above), Not ranked in real estate
The partner notorious partner that came over is in M&A. That beings said, fit is more important.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Arbiter213
- Posts: 2248
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: Greenberg Traurig or Chadbourne and Parke
dabbadon8 wrote:Looking at the Chambers rankings... for your stated interests.
Greenberg: Band 1 General Commercial Litigation: Highly Regarded, Band 1 Real Estate: Mainly Dirt
Chadbourne: Band 3 (same as above), Not ranked in real estate
The partner notorious partner that came over is in M&A. That beings said, fit is more important.
Checked: It's band 1 for the "Highly Regarded" Band. So this is correct (Chadbourne is in fact Band 3 for that).
Last edited by Arbiter213 on Fri Sep 28, 2012 4:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 350859
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Greenberg Traurig or Chadbourne and Parke
OP here. I'm not entirely sure what these means, but:Arbiter213 wrote:Without checking, I'm just gonna go out on a limb here and say Greenberg is not, in fact, Band 1 in NYdabbadon8 wrote:Looking at the Chambers rankings... for your stated interests.
Greenberg: Band 1 General Commercial Litigation: Highly Regarded, Band 1 Real Estate: Mainly Dirt
Chadbourne: Band 3 (same as above), Not ranked in real estate
The partner notorious partner that came over is in M&A. That beings said, fit is more important.
Litigation: General Commercial: Highly Regarded: New York
Band 1
Allen & Overy LLP
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
O'Melveny & Myers LLP
http://www.chambersandpartners.com/Usa/ ... 7#org_3579
-
dabbadon8
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 2:17 am
Re: Greenberg Traurig or Chadbourne and Parke
It would be band five objectively. Chambers has it listed by "The elite" bands 1-4, followed by "Highly regarded" bands 1-3. So yes and no.Arbiter213 wrote:Without checking, I'm just gonna go out on a limb here and say Greenberg is not, in fact, Band 1 in NYdabbadon8 wrote:Looking at the Chambers rankings... for your stated interests.
Greenberg: Band 1 General Commercial Litigation: Highly Regarded, Band 1 Real Estate: Mainly Dirt
Chadbourne: Band 3 (same as above), Not ranked in real estate
The partner notorious partner that came over is in M&A. That beings said, fit is more important.
-
Arbiter213
- Posts: 2248
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: Greenberg Traurig or Chadbourne and Parke
Yah I saw what you meant when I checked.dabbadon8 wrote:It would be band five objectively. Chambers has it listed by "The elite" bands 1-4, followed by "Highly regarded" bands 1-3. So yes and no.Arbiter213 wrote:Without checking, I'm just gonna go out on a limb here and say Greenberg is not, in fact, Band 1 in NYdabbadon8 wrote:Looking at the Chambers rankings... for your stated interests.
Greenberg: Band 1 General Commercial Litigation: Highly Regarded, Band 1 Real Estate: Mainly Dirt
Chadbourne: Band 3 (same as above), Not ranked in real estate
The partner notorious partner that came over is in M&A. That beings said, fit is more important.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 350859
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Greenberg Traurig or Chadbourne and Parke
anymore insight onto this? what do people think of chadbourne?
