Latham (NY) vs. Gibson (NY) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Latham (NY) vs. Gibson (NY)
Trying to decide between Latham and Gibson in NYC. Interested in transactional work. Any thoughts?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Latham (NY) vs. Gibson (NY)
Take Gibson. They're about the same quality and Gibson is much more stable.Anonymous User wrote:Trying to decide between Latham and Gibson in NYC. Interested in transactional work. Any thoughts?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Latham (NY) vs. Gibson (NY)
Purely on caliber of work and prominence of practice, for corporate, the easy answer is Latham. I cannot give any specific advice about stability because all we know are the firms' pasts, but Latham's NYC class sizes have been pretty small over the last few summers (with the most recent summer being around 25) and all their other class sizes are similarly restrained. Their current leverage is pretty average so it appears they are trying to grow more conservatively (but who knows).
