Paul Hastings v. Patterson Belknap? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
benewagain
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:58 am
Paul Hastings v. Patterson Belknap?
Any thoughts? Seems like there's no bad choice here, but wondering what factors others would consider. I'm definitely not on the partner track but am looking for somewhere with smart colleagues, good work, and a generally tolerable environment. Don't really care much about supposed prestige differences between these two.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432035
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Paul Hastings v. Patterson Belknap?
Patterson is a no brainer. I know several people that worked at both, and I can tell you the ones at Patterson absolutely love not only the work assignments but the people they work with as well.
