Are there non V100 firms still considered BigLaw? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 431708
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Are there non V100 firms still considered BigLaw?
I'm thinking of firms, for instance, on the NLJ250 but not the V100. What exactly is the border of BigLaw when it comes to the rankings. I realize this is a dumb question to some extent. tyia.
- fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: Are there non V100 firms still considered BigLaw?
some of these firms pay $160k/yr starting salaries, but that doesn't make them biglaw. avoid like the plague.
-
- Posts: 2489
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm
Re: Are there non V100 firms still considered BigLaw?
I mean there's pretty much only 100 firms worth working for (the Vault 100) if you want to have a successful legal career. Choose accordingly and pray you get one.
- Aberzombie1892
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 am
Re: Are there non V100 firms still considered BigLaw?
NLJ firms are generally big law. But then again, what do you consider makes Vault firms big law over NLJ firms in general?
-
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:36 pm
Re: Are there non V100 firms still considered BigLaw?
Yes. There are lots of great firms not in the Vault rankings. And plenty of very large firms not in the Vault rankings, or even the NLJ350. Apply broadly and get some real offers, then start choosing between the firms.Anonymous User wrote:this is a dumb question to some extent. tyia.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431708
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Are there non V100 firms still considered BigLaw?
Seems like flame, but could you elaborate?paulinaporizkova wrote:I mean there's pretty much only 100 firms worth working for (the Vault 100) if you want to have a successful legal career. Choose accordingly and pray you get one.
-
- Posts: 431708
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Are there non V100 firms still considered BigLaw?
I don't think the necesarily, but I have an offer from a firm not in the V100 but in the N250, and am curious about the perception/differences. I know it's all just generalizations.Aberzombie1892 wrote:NLJ firms are generally big law. But then again, what do you consider makes Vault firms big law over NLJ firms in general?
-
- Posts: 431708
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Are there non V100 firms still considered BigLaw?
I think several big UK law firms with great international presences might be considered the equivalent of US biglaws. They pay US lawyers pretty well in their oversea offices, often 160K + a big COLA package.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Are there non V100 firms still considered BigLaw?
In my mind: firms that pay market (or close to it) = biglaw.Anonymous User wrote:I'm thinking of firms, for instance, on the NLJ250 but not the V100. What exactly is the border of BigLaw when it comes to the rankings. I realize this is a dumb question to some extent. tyia.
For example, Farella Braun is neither NLJ250 nor V100, but I would consider it biglaw. There are firms on the NLJ250 (e.g. Hinshaw Culbertson) that are large firms that I would not consider biglaw. But there isn't really a stark line that you can draw in the sand.
-
- Posts: 431708
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Are there non V100 firms still considered BigLaw?
SMH. You have to be trolling.paulinaporizkova wrote:I mean there's pretty much only 100 firms worth working for (the Vault 100) if you want to have a successful legal career. Choose accordingly and pray you get one.
-
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:01 pm
Re: Are there non V100 firms still considered BigLaw?
Definitely. As one example, Kazowitz wasn't V100 until this year, but it did not just suddenly become "Biglaw" this year.
This is all a bit silly, since "Biglaw" isn't really an actual "thing." It's just a term for the large law firm industry.
This is all a bit silly, since "Biglaw" isn't really an actual "thing." It's just a term for the large law firm industry.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login