Skadden vs. Cravath for litigation Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432843
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Skadden vs. Cravath for litigation
If I'm looking for the best litigation firm (possibly with the hope of going to a U.S. Attorney's Office down the line), which should I choose: Skadden or Cravath?
-
ph14
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:15 pm
Re: Skadden vs. Cravath for litigation
Cravath.Anonymous User wrote:If I'm looking for the best litigation firm (possibly with the hope of going to a U.S. Attorney's Office down the line), which should I choose: Skadden or Cravath?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432843
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Skadden vs. Cravath for litigation
Doesn't make a difference. Skadden has a lot more alums, however, since it is a larger firm. So, with Skadden, you're likely to have more people to reach out to for networking and ins into the USAO.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432843
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Skadden vs. Cravath for litigation
OP here: any other comments?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
