Skadden v. Simpson (Both NYC) Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432577
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Skadden v. Simpson (Both NYC)
Offers from both. Practice area preference is very open, possibly leaning litigation. What's the better choice?
-
- Posts: 432577
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Skadden v. Simpson (Both NYC)
Friend who works in the lit department at Skadden says it's pretty brutal. Screamers, etc. Others have confirmed that lit at Skadden can be rough. I'd go w/ STB, though "fit" should play some part in this as the two firms have very different cultures.Anonymous User wrote:Offers from both. Practice area preference is very open, possibly leaning litigation. What's the better choice?