Debevoise v. Willkie v. WilmerHale Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432616
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Debevoise v. Willkie v. WilmerHale
All in NYC. I'm leaning litigation but fairly open at this point
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432616
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Debevoise v. Willkie v. WilmerHale
debevoise....is this even that hard if you want NYC....
-
imchuckbass58
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:24 pm
Re: Debevoise v. Willkie v. WilmerHale
If there's any decent possibility you will do corporate, Debevoise is the answer by a wide margin.
If you said you were sure about litigation it would be closer (to be clear: closer with Wilmer Hale), but even then in NY I think you're better off with Debevoise absent any really strong feelings re: fit.
If you said you were sure about litigation it would be closer (to be clear: closer with Wilmer Hale), but even then in NY I think you're better off with Debevoise absent any really strong feelings re: fit.
