Do you think NYC Biglaw are reluctant to take in old graduates?
(Old: 33-36)
'Cause that's what I've heard.
Any opinions?
Are Biglaw NYC firms against "old" graduates? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:18 am
- kwais
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 12:28 pm
Re: Are Biglaw NYC firms against "old" graduates?
Why do we have 2 of these going at once?
Some seem to appreciate work experience, some seem to stay away from older folks
Some seem to appreciate work experience, some seem to stay away from older folks
-
- Posts: 432542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Are Biglaw NYC firms against "old" graduates?
Some firms—Skadden comes to mind—seem more willing to take older graduates than others.roranoa wrote:Do you think NYC Biglaw are reluctant to take in old graduates?
(Old: 33-36)
'Cause that's what I've heard.
Any opinions?
-
- Posts: 432542
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Are Biglaw NYC firms against "old" graduates?
Some are and some aren't. I've had some firms come out and say, "we prefer k-jd type hires" and others that say, "we don't hire anyone without real WE." I am in my mid-thirties and over all I don't think it's been a big negative. If you spent the last 10 years of your life working at Kinko's or Burger King, maybe. But if you have some solid WE over that time, and your older, I don't think it matters much. Two reoccurring question I have received in regards to attending law school so "late" in life is "why leave your career to attend law school," and "would you be ok working with and taking direction from someone younger than you?" If you have solid responses to those questions you should be ok.roranoa wrote:Do you think NYC Biglaw are reluctant to take in old graduates?
(Old: 33-36)
'Cause that's what I've heard.
Any opinions?
-
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 11:18 am
Re: Are Biglaw NYC firms against "old" graduates?
I don't know what you mean by your first sentence.kwais wrote:Why do we have 2 of these going at once?
Some seem to appreciate work experience, some seem to stay away from older folks
-
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 1:22 am
Re: Are Biglaw NYC firms against "old" graduates?
In my experience, it's been a negative, but that could be me mixing up correlation and causation. I did have one pointed "age" question that made me want to punch the screener in the face. In retrospect, I wish I had gotten rid of the grays pre-recruiting season.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login