Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
All NYC offices, want to do lit, anyone have opinions on any of these 3?
Last edited by Anonymous User on Sat Sep 01, 2012 11:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
Only met with Curtis out of this particular group. I thought they were great, and I like places with lower associate:partner ratios like that (theirs is the best of the three here; their lit department ratio is somewhat better than Proskauer's, and miles above Shearman's 4:1). Proskauer has the nicer offices, though.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
OP here, thanks - thats a good point. Broader question - other then associate to partner ratios what kind of things do you think are most important in choosing a firm?
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
When did you meet with Curtis? When was offer given?
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
OP, I also got an offer from Curtis. I really like them, but there was something lacking in the atmosphere. I know that is vague, but I'm wondering if you had an cultural hesitations after your visit?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:13 pm
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
Proskauer's NYC office is gorgeous. Small factor to consider, but it certainly seems an inspiring place to work. The choice should depend on what kind of lit you want to do. If you're interested in L&E litigation, then Proskauer is a no-brainer.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
Can anyone with an offer from Curtis elaborate on when you had your CB and when you got your offer? Much appreciated.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
Anonymous User wrote:Can anyone with an offer from Curtis elaborate on when you had your CB and when you got your offer? Much appreciated.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
OP here I have offers from the other 2 upcoming callback with Curtis Mallet which I am excited about and hope results in an offer as well. Just trying to get the buzz on all 3 in case these end up being my options.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
I am surprised so many people liked Curtis. The guy I interviewed with didn't have a shred of personality and openly talked about how bad his firm was (not even kidding). Weirdest interview I had at OCI. Guess I just got a bad interviewer or something
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
Interesting that was the opposite of my experience. The guy who came from Curtis had left and gone to a very prestigious firm in a different market and returned a few years later. He said others had done the same realizing Curtis was as good as it got in big law in a lot of ways. He also talked about how people tend to stay there for a long time. All of which I found pretty compelling.Anonymous User wrote:I am surprised so many people liked Curtis. The guy I interviewed with didn't have a shred of personality and openly talked about how bad his firm was (not even kidding). Weirdest interview I had at OCI. Guess I just got a bad interviewer or something
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
I had a very similar experience with both my screener and callback.Anonymous User wrote:Interesting that was the opposite of my experience. The guy who came from Curtis had left and gone to a very prestigious firm in a different market and returned a few years later. He said others had done the same realizing Curtis was as good as it got in big law in a lot of ways. He also talked about how people tend to stay there for a long time. All of which I found pretty compelling.Anonymous User wrote:I am surprised so many people liked Curtis. The guy I interviewed with didn't have a shred of personality and openly talked about how bad his firm was (not even kidding). Weirdest interview I had at OCI. Guess I just got a bad interviewer or something
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
Does Shearman have good lit? My sense is their strength is transactional work.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
Should Vault ranking be a factor here?
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
Mind sharing when you got your offer/when your callback was?Anonymous User wrote:OP, I also got an offer from Curtis. I really like them, but there was something lacking in the atmosphere. I know that is vague, but I'm wondering if you had an cultural hesitations after your visit?
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
OP here - thanks for the responses so far - anyone care to add anything about any of these three firms?
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
The smaller summer classes of Proskauer and Curtis probably would shield you better from another downturn. Proskauer has better name recognition domestically, so unless you're really keen on doing international work, I think that's the way to go.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
I have a similar question re: Shearman - are they really in decline? Is the name still bigger then others on this list or say a Wilkie Farr, Dechert etc.
-
- Posts: 432524
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Proskauer v. Shearman & Sterling v. Curtis Mallet for Lit
how long did it take those who got curtis offers to get the offer post-cb?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login