Stroock or Schulte? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Stroock or Schulte?
..
Last edited by Old Gregg on Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Stroock or Schulte?
Some of the Schulte partners and senior associates I met were former V10 associates.
-
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: Stroock or Schulte?
I know a lot of people who burned out of NYC biglaw and laTTTeraled into my secondary market. V5, 10, 50, 100, whatever, didn't make that much of a difference. Probably means a bit more if you want to stay in NYC.Fresh Prince wrote:Cool bro, well now you can stop talking out of your ass in a thread that doesn't interest you. Everyone wins.HeavenWood wrote:Ego's not bruised, breh. I'm not even interested in NYC biglawl, so vault rankings are pretty much meaningless for me.Fresh Prince wrote:HeavenWood wrote:^Far superior if you stick with the firm. Definitely better if you want to leave the legal field entirely. More flexibility if you want to stay in law. Still, for the typical person who laterals out in 3-5 years, there isn't that huge of a difference. I'm not saying I would recommend Strook/Schulte over a V10 for most people in the very beginning, but as far as lifetime legal career goes, you're not losing THAT much, however much it may stroke your ego to think otherwise.
I didn't invite the comparison in the first place. I just said they are mediocre, which they are. You are the one with the injured ego.
And you can believe the last sentence of your post if that'll help you heal that bruised ego.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Stroock or Schulte?
Yes, this definitely makes you able to make the statement you made above.
"people from many high and low ranked firms lateraled into my market, therefore exit options not significantly different.
lol.
"people from many high and low ranked firms lateraled into my market, therefore exit options not significantly different.
lol.
-
- Posts: 2890
- Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: Stroock or Schulte?
That's the way it works around here. Firms don't really care that much.Fresh Prince wrote:Yes, this definitely makes you able to make the statement you made above.
"people from many high and low ranked firms lateraled into my market, therefore exit options not significantly different.
lol.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- alphasteve
- Posts: 18374
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 11:12 pm
Re: Stroock or Schulte?
Should we really have this situation where you post for a while, and then everyone learns who you are and what your firm is, and then you gchat people to ask to have posts remove that out you?Fresh Prince wrote:
That's really funny that you should say that, because I work at a V10 and I have friends at both of the firms in this thread who have fairly senior positions.
You're "sorely kidding yourself," so go back to reading your law books.
Edit: your statement above is dumb. No way to know where people will end up in 10 years. But exit options from V10 are superior to exit options from either of the above firms, if that's what you were implying.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Stroock or Schulte?
Edit: alphasteve's right, i'm wrong. my bad.
Last edited by Old Gregg on Tue Aug 28, 2012 2:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- alphasteve
- Posts: 18374
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 11:12 pm
Re: Stroock or Schulte?
You are on borrowed time. You may want to act like it.Fresh Prince wrote:No, I just think situations where people post the specific firm or hint at what it is calls for that, but that distinction might be hard to figure out.alphasteve wrote:Should we really have this situation where you post for a while, and then everyone learns who you are and what your firm is, and then you gchat people to ask to have posts remove that out you?Fresh Prince wrote:
That's really funny that you should say that, because I work at a V10 and I have friends at both of the firms in this thread who have fairly senior positions.
You're "sorely kidding yourself," so go back to reading your law books.
Edit: your statement above is dumb. No way to know where people will end up in 10 years. But exit options from V10 are superior to exit options from either of the above firms, if that's what you were implying.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Stroock or Schulte?
alphasteve: apologies if I'm coming across as aggressive in some of my posts. will dial it down.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Stroock or Schulte?
Wait, what's the basis for this? I haven't heard much about Schulte, but I thought Stroock's culture had a decent rep relative to larger firms?Anonymous User wrote:Use offers to leverage callbacks? How does one do that? Strook and Schulte are both known as not particularly pleasant places to work, and as previously mentioned their narrow specialization means that they are more susceptible to market fluctuations.LawIdiot86 wrote:My guess would be that they are both known for their structured finance and investment management groups, but aren't as diversified or top-tier as a Fried Frank, Shearman, or Bingham, let alone a Skadden or DPW. OP presumably has 28 days with these two offers and could try to leverage them into CBs at other firms.Anonymous User wrote:Why all the hate? They are both in the top 80 of vault rankings....Anonymous User wrote:Hold out for an offer from somewhere else (I say this as someone who only has one offer right now, and it's from one of those two firms).
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Stroock or Schulte?
Bumping this because relevant to my interests, and maybe we can get some more on-topic discussion this time? Thinking in terms of job security, exit options, which has the better corp/lit dept. etc.
-
- Posts: 431124
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Stroock or Schulte?
DEFINITELY STROOCK
- nealric
- Posts: 4352
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:53 am
Re: Stroock or Schulte?
Impressive necro thread. 5 years must be some sort of record around here.Anonymous User wrote:DEFINITELY STROOCK
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 953
- Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2016 3:55 pm
Re: Stroock or Schulte?
Anon, too. Hits everything on the autist checklist.nealric wrote:Impressive necro thread. 5 years must be some sort of record around here.Anonymous User wrote:DEFINITELY STROOCK
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login