interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners
CB tomorrow has 1 partner, 3 of counsels. I have not interviewed with any "of counsel" attorneys yet. Generally speaking, should I treat them more like a partner or more like an associate? I tend to ask associates questions more about their day-to-day, getting assignments, partner associate relations, firm culture, etc. I tend to ask partners bigger questions like firm growth areas, firm culture, etc.
- frank galvin
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 9:44 pm
Re: interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners
Treat them like partners.
- ben4847
- Posts: 788
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:38 pm
Re: interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners
I had a screener with an of counsel. I was surprised, until I saw that it was former MA governor Bill Weld. Then I was more surprised.
Nice guy. Didn't seem at all like he was about to jump in the Charles River.
Nice guy. Didn't seem at all like he was about to jump in the Charles River.
-
- Posts: 3727
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 2:23 pm
Re: interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners
Treat them like senior associates, it's basically what they are.Anonymous User wrote:CB tomorrow has 1 partner, 3 of counsels. I have not interviewed with any "of counsel" attorneys yet. Generally speaking, should I treat them more like a partner or more like an associate? I tend to ask associates questions more about their day-to-day, getting assignments, partner associate relations, firm culture, etc. I tend to ask partners bigger questions like firm growth areas, firm culture, etc.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners
bdubs wrote:Treat them like senior associates, it's basically what they are.Anonymous User wrote:CB tomorrow has 1 partner, 3 of counsels. I have not interviewed with any "of counsel" attorneys yet. Generally speaking, should I treat them more like a partner or more like an associate? I tend to ask associates questions more about their day-to-day, getting assignments, partner associate relations, firm culture, etc. I tend to ask partners bigger questions like firm growth areas, firm culture, etc.

I would ask them the "partner" questions rather than the associate questions, particularly about assignments.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners
This.IAFG wrote:bdubs wrote:Treat them like senior associates, it's basically what they are.Anonymous User wrote:CB tomorrow has 1 partner, 3 of counsels. I have not interviewed with any "of counsel" attorneys yet. Generally speaking, should I treat them more like a partner or more like an associate? I tend to ask associates questions more about their day-to-day, getting assignments, partner associate relations, firm culture, etc. I tend to ask partners bigger questions like firm growth areas, firm culture, etc.Just because that's ~what they are doesn't mean that's how they want to be treated.
I would ask them the "partner" questions rather than the associate questions, particularly about assignments.
"Of counsel" means different things at different firms. Sometimes it's a step towards partner. Sometimes it's someone who's senior but isn't gonna make partner for whatever reason (not enough business, or family stuff, or whatever). Sometimes it's an old dude who's nearing retirement.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners
Definitely like partners. Some of the of counsels at my firm are former partners who went off to do more prestigious things (federal judges, politicians) and after retiring from that other thing came back to the firm part-time. They can be extremely powerful and important people.
At my firm a few of the of counsels have more pull than many senior partners.
At my firm a few of the of counsels have more pull than many senior partners.
-
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:36 pm
Re: interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners
When in doubt, always treat people to be more senior and/or important than you assume them to be.
-
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:16 am
Re: interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners
Former MA Supreme Judicial Court Chief Justice is "Of Counsel" for Choate Hall.
Treat her like an associate!! LOLOLOLOL
Treat her like an associate!! LOLOLOLOL
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners
And be sure to treat 8th year "partners" at K&E like senior associates, since everyone knows that's basically what they are.bdubs wrote:Treat them like senior associates, it's basically what they are.Anonymous User wrote:CB tomorrow has 1 partner, 3 of counsels. I have not interviewed with any "of counsel" attorneys yet. Generally speaking, should I treat them more like a partner or more like an associate? I tend to ask associates questions more about their day-to-day, getting assignments, partner associate relations, firm culture, etc. I tend to ask partners bigger questions like firm growth areas, firm culture, etc.
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners
My summer firm had an "of counsel" who used to be partner at another firm. Not sure why he ended up of counsel at my firm, but I am sure an interviewee who treated him like a senior associate and asked things like how he gets assignments from partners would get glowing evaluations.rad lulz wrote:This.IAFG wrote:bdubs wrote:Treat them like senior associates, it's basically what they are.Anonymous User wrote:CB tomorrow has 1 partner, 3 of counsels. I have not interviewed with any "of counsel" attorneys yet. Generally speaking, should I treat them more like a partner or more like an associate? I tend to ask associates questions more about their day-to-day, getting assignments, partner associate relations, firm culture, etc. I tend to ask partners bigger questions like firm growth areas, firm culture, etc.Just because that's ~what they are doesn't mean that's how they want to be treated.
I would ask them the "partner" questions rather than the associate questions, particularly about assignments.
"Of counsel" means different things at different firms. Sometimes it's a step towards partner. Sometimes it's someone who's senior but isn't gonna make partner for whatever reason (not enough business, or family stuff, or whatever). Sometimes it's an old dude who's nearing retirement.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners
Sometimes lateral partners are brought on as Of Counsel for a year or two before being upped to equity status.Anonymous User wrote:My summer firm had an "of counsel" who used to be partner at another firm. Not sure why he ended up of counsel at my firm, but I am sure an interviewee who treated him like a senior associate and asked things like how he gets assignments from partners would get glowing evaluations.rad lulz wrote:This.IAFG wrote:bdubs wrote:
Treat them like senior associates, it's basically what they are.Just because that's ~what they are doesn't mean that's how they want to be treated.
I would ask them the "partner" questions rather than the associate questions, particularly about assignments.
"Of counsel" means different things at different firms. Sometimes it's a step towards partner. Sometimes it's someone who's senior but isn't gonna make partner for whatever reason (not enough business, or family stuff, or whatever). Sometimes it's an old dude who's nearing retirement.
-
- Posts: 775
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 7:16 am
Re: interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners
rayiner can they give you an award for "guy who fucking knows basically everything about legal employment"
you should become a lawyer's headhunter when you retire
you should become a lawyer's headhunter when you retire
-
- Posts: 432521
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: interviews with "of counsel" instead of associates/partners
Interviewed with an "Of Counsel" lawyer yesterday who seemed to be in charge of the group doing OCI. Great interview and callback shortly after. I'd say treat them like you'd treat a partner, but more importantly treat them like someone you'd want to hire you.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login