Employment Litigation Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 1:38 pm
Employment Litigation
For OCI, I've targeted a lot of firms with strong L&E groups, because I'm pretty interested in employment litigation, but I'm wondering what kinds of exit options exist for someone who practices solely in employment litigation. Is USAO Civil an option? I imagine USAO criminal is tougher? I know one of the advantages of employment litigation is that smaller cases lead to more substantive responsibilities for younger associates. But can that substantive responsibility help with securing a government gig?
- nevdash
- Posts: 418
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 5:01 pm
Re: Employment Litigation
USAO Civil, DOL, NLRB, state AG civil. I've known/heard of lawyers from management-side firms who went on to all of these.
- sojuteacher
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:53 am
Re: Employment Litigation
the EEOC, of course. (they'll eventually have to start hiring again)
-
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:36 pm
Re: Employment Litigation
What they --sojuteacher and nevdash -- said.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login