Firm Names Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432497
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Firm Names
During interviews is it ok to call them by a shortened name? Like Fried Frank? Or do you have to refer to them as Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson.
-
Emma.
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm
Re: Firm Names
Lulz.Anonymous User wrote:During interviews is it ok to call them by a shortened name? Like Fried Frank? Or do you have to refer to them as Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson.
Short is fine.
-
ze2151
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 5:51 pm
Re: Firm Names
serious question? if serious, why post anon?
yes, no one expects you to say "cadwalader, wickersham, and taft" every time you mention the firm name. your interviewer wouldn't do that. also, look at some of the website names for firms.
alston.com
mckennalong.com
sutherland.com
milbank.com
kasowitz.com
skadden.com
they're giving you permission.
yes, no one expects you to say "cadwalader, wickersham, and taft" every time you mention the firm name. your interviewer wouldn't do that. also, look at some of the website names for firms.
alston.com
mckennalong.com
sutherland.com
milbank.com
kasowitz.com
skadden.com
they're giving you permission.
-
rad lulz
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: Firm Names
HTH broAnonymous User wrote:Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
-
JusticeHarlan
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: Firm Names
mofo.comze2151 wrote:serious question? if serious, why post anon?
yes, no one expects you to say "cadwalader, wickersham, and taft" every time you mention the firm name. your interviewer wouldn't do that. also, look at some of the website names for firms.
alston.com
mckennalong.com
sutherland.com
milbank.com
kasowitz.com
skadden.com
they're giving you permission.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Haymarket
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 1:09 pm
Re: Firm Names
What is this, amateur hour?rad lulz wrote:HTH broAnonymous User wrote:Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & JacobsonLLPLimited Liability Partnership
-
fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: Firm Names
fwiw, my interviewer asked "so why are you interested in MoFo?"JusticeHarlan wrote: mofo.com
-
rad lulz
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: Firm Names
I can't really picture you stylin on dem Shearman bros now what you're engaged.fatduck wrote:fwiw, my interviewer asked "so why are you interested in MoFo?"JusticeHarlan wrote: mofo.com
-
fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: Firm Names
not sure the patent group qualifies as ALPHA AS FUCKrad lulz wrote:I can't really picture you stylin on dem Shearman bros now what you're engaged.fatduck wrote:fwiw, my interviewer asked "so why are you interested in MoFo?"JusticeHarlan wrote: mofo.com
