Help me out - bid list 3.51 (3.3 median) lower t-14 Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 431346
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Help me out - bid list 3.51 (3.3 median) lower t-14
Kinda lost doing the bid list. Have done research but it hasn't given me a good feel for my odds at each firm and how that should affect my bidding. Some TLS help would be great. 3.51 w/ 3.3 median at a lower t-14 (~ top 1/3, maybe higher idk). K-JD. Goal: make sure I get an offer. Interested in litigation. All offices NYC (except the one I noted), looked at the size of the litigation department, expected SA class size and w/e info on selectivity I could find. Hoping to maximize the amount of interviews I can get (and generally odds of landing an offer). My list is one short. I threw in hogan lovells, Linklaters, clifford chance, and Hughes Hubbard but don't really have much of an idea about their selectivity. Any feed back would be great, I feel I may be overbidding especially in 6-10 range. Thanks.
Cahill
Proskauer
Milbank
Dechert
Cadwalader
Kasowitz
Shearman
Weil
Skadden
Cleary
White & Case
Fried Frank
Latham
Simpson Thatcher
Holland & Knight (FL, w/ strong FL ties)
Gibson Dunn
Ropes Gray
Jones Day
Wilmer Hale
Hughes Hubbard
hogan lovells
Davis Polk
Linklaters
Paul Hastings
Strook
Seward
Sidley Austin
Allen & Overy
clifford chance
MoFo
Cahill
Proskauer
Milbank
Dechert
Cadwalader
Kasowitz
Shearman
Weil
Skadden
Cleary
White & Case
Fried Frank
Latham
Simpson Thatcher
Holland & Knight (FL, w/ strong FL ties)
Gibson Dunn
Ropes Gray
Jones Day
Wilmer Hale
Hughes Hubbard
hogan lovells
Davis Polk
Linklaters
Paul Hastings
Strook
Seward
Sidley Austin
Allen & Overy
clifford chance
MoFo
Last edited by Anonymous User on Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:41 pm, edited 10 times in total.
-
- Posts: 431346
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Help me out - bid list 3.51 (3.3 median) lower t-14
Take out S&C. They are extremely grade sensitive and even that low, it's probably a waste of a bid.
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Help me out - bid list 3.51 (3.3 median) lower t-14
You're already anonymous. Name your school.
-
- Posts: 1710
- Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:09 am
Re: Help me out - bid list 3.51 (3.3 median) lower t-14
Agree with this. Cravath, Cleary, Simpson, Latham, Skadden, Davis, Debevoise, maybe Weil should likely come off too.Anonymous User wrote:Take out S&C. They are extremely grade sensitive and even that low, it's probably a waste of a bid.
Firms worth considering (this is a mostly-lit list, but generally firms w/good reputations that you seem to have missed):
Kramer Levin
Willkie
Kronish Lieb
Kaye Scholer
Schulte
Mayer Brown
Kasowitz Benson
Greenberg Traurig
O'Melveny (only if you're desperate)
Cooley
Chadbourne
Freshfields
Richards Kibbe
Bingham
Cadwalader
Hughes Hubbard
- jess
- Posts: 18149
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2011 8:27 pm
Re: Help me out - bid list 3.51 (3.3 median) lower t-14
.
Last edited by jess on Thu Oct 26, 2017 9:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 431346
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Help me out - bid list 3.51 (3.3 median) lower t-14
OP school is duke.itbdvorm wrote:Agree with this. Cravath, Cleary, Simpson, Latham, Skadden, Davis, Debevoise, maybe Weil should likely come off too.Anonymous User wrote:Take out S&C. They are extremely grade sensitive and even that low, it's probably a waste of a bid.
Firms worth considering (this is a mostly-lit list, but generally firms w/good reputations that you seem to have missed):
Kramer Levin
Willkie
Kronish Lieb
Kaye Scholer
Schulte
Mayer Brown
Kasowitz Benson
Greenberg Traurig
O'Melveny (only if you're desperate)
Cooley
Chadbourne
Freshfields
Richards Kibbe
Bingham
Cadwalader
Hughes Hubbard
Cooley is expecting 6 SAs so thought that wasn't a great use of a bid. Have Cadwalader. O'Melveny has only DC/CA offices coming. Where would you put Kasowitz and Hughes Hubbard? The rest aren't coming as far as I am aware.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Tue Jun 19, 2012 9:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 12:24 am
Re: Help me out - bid list 3.51 (3.3 median) lower t-14
Wouldn't 3.51 put you in the top quarter at Duke? Clearly, Weil, STB all seem worth a bid. S&C off, probably same with Cravath.
-
- Posts: 431346
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Help me out - bid list 3.51 (3.3 median) lower t-14
OP here. It could but I honestly don't know for sure. If not, I should be pretty close to it.ajaxconstructions wrote:Wouldn't 3.51 put you in the top quarter at Duke? Clearly, Weil, STB all seem worth a bid. S&C off, probably same with Cravath.
Gonna replace Cravath/S&C with Stroock and Sweard. Probably throw on Sutherland. Any ideas for location?
-
- Posts: 431346
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Help me out - bid list 3.51 (3.3 median) lower t-14
Updated the bid list based on suggestions here as well as the amount of interview slots available. Would still appreciate some feedback.
-
- Posts: 431346
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Help me out - bid list 3.51 (3.3 median) lower t-14
What's wrong with O'Melveny? I lived in Asia before law school and liked how much of their practice seems to deal with east Asia. Is there a problem with this firm? It was my #1 bid (3.70ish/3.3 median, just outside T14).itbdvorm wrote:Agree with this. Cravath, Cleary, Simpson, Latham, Skadden, Davis, Debevoise, maybe Weil should likely come off too.Anonymous User wrote:Take out S&C. They are extremely grade sensitive and even that low, it's probably a waste of a bid.
Firms worth considering (this is a mostly-lit list, but generally firms w/good reputations that you seem to have missed):
Kramer Levin
Willkie
Kronish Lieb
Kaye Scholer
Schulte
Mayer Brown
Kasowitz Benson
Greenberg Traurig
O'Melveny (only if you're desperate)
Cooley
Chadbourne
Freshfields
Richards Kibbe
Bingham
Cadwalader
Hughes Hubbard
-
- Posts: 431346
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login