patent litigation to 180k? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
patent litigation to 180k?
Is it about time? Or will that be too disruptive, rendering the Desmarais move irrelevant? All it takes, folks, is one firm - say - Kirkland - to do this. And they get all the star patent lit candidates. Right now, they compete with maybe a half-dozen other elite litigation firms for the same candidates, and then maybe 50 other so-so patent groups throughout the V100.
I'm hearing some chatter at my firm that they're going to give headhunters a higher fee for landing qualified patent litigation laterals. But just chatter at this point. Will not identify firm.
Some firms already pay higher bonus for CAFC clerks.
I'm hearing some chatter at my firm that they're going to give headhunters a higher fee for landing qualified patent litigation laterals. But just chatter at this point. Will not identify firm.
Some firms already pay higher bonus for CAFC clerks.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2012 5:42 pm
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
I'd be surprised if a firm with diversified practices like Kirkland decided to raise only one group's salary. Granted, there are certain requirements/skills to be a patent litigator, but it still sends a mixed message over the value the firm places on certain employees work. I don't agree with that - that it sends such a message, however, it will likely cause other associates to be upset. Raising IP lit. salaries would be the crack needed to bring the 180 floodgates down for everyone.Anonymous User wrote:Is it about time? Or will that be too disruptive? All it takes, folks, is one firm - say - Kirkland - to do this. And they get all the star patent lit candidates. Right now, they compete with maybe a half-dozen other elite litigation firms for the same candidates, and then maybe 50 other so-so patent groups throughout the V100.
I'm hearing some chatter at my firm that they're going to give headhunters a higher fee for landing qualified patent litigation laterals. But just chatter at this point. Will not identify firm.
Some firms already pay higher bonus for CAFC clerks.
In other words, aside from boutique IP-only firms ( as we've already seen), when 180 happens, it will be for everyone.
As for the CAFC clerk argument, this preferential treatment only applies to associates that also clerked on other courts. Not the same kind of disparate treatment.
I don't see it happening.
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
There are non-top firms that already pay entry-level patent attorneys more than other entry level attorneys.
-
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 11:25 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
It's an interesting idea that makes sense to me. Patent Lit has been the growing engine for a lot of firms lately (Quinn, Kirkland, Weil) and from what I've heard it has been probably the busiest practice group at most firms - would make sense to me
-
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 2:03 pm
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
This is true.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:There are non-top firms that already pay entry-level patent attorneys more than other entry level attorneys.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
There are Vault firms that do this in some sub-160 markets as well, even firms that are tops in their respective home markets, they just aren't NY-based V10s.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:There are non-top firms that already pay entry-level patent attorneys more than other entry level attorneys.
-
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
Is Finnegan back to market yet?
-
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
Such asJulio_El_Chavo wrote:There are non-top firms that already pay entry-level patent attorneys more than other entry level attorneys.
-
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
Wat finnegan went under market???Anonymous User wrote:Is Finnegan back to market yet?
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
I think you'd see bonuses before you see them going 180K. Desmaris is too small to set the market, and KE is already getting top talent. You'll see the midrange IP firms trying to poach with signing bonuses, etc etc, before you see a large salary change.
-
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
Yes.Anonymous User wrote:Is Finnegan back to market yet?
-
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
Briefly.Anonymous User wrote:Wat finnegan went under market???Anonymous User wrote:Is Finnegan back to market yet?
-
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
See NALP directory for Kilpatrick Townsend (Atlanta).Anonymous User wrote:Such asJulio_El_Chavo wrote:There are non-top firms that already pay entry-level patent attorneys more than other entry level attorneys.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
Along with at least 1 other ATL firm as well (the info isn't on NALP, was told in an interview by an associate), and I know of at least 1 regional biglaw firm in St. Louis that does the same thing for IP associates.Anonymous User wrote:See NALP directory for Kilpatrick Townsend (Atlanta).Anonymous User wrote:Such asJulio_El_Chavo wrote:There are non-top firms that already pay entry-level patent attorneys more than other entry level attorneys.
-
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
I know someone who successfully negotiated at 180K start with a V50. I had no idea that was even possible.
- cantaboot
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:12 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
abt negotiation: had the said person worked as a student attorney at the firm before he/she finished law school?
-
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
Were they bringing in business? Advanced degree or registration number?Anonymous User wrote:I know someone who successfully negotiated at 180K start with a V50. I had no idea that was even possible.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
http://www.nalpdirectory.comAnonymous User wrote:Such asJulio_El_Chavo wrote:There are non-top firms that already pay entry-level patent attorneys more than other entry level attorneys.
-
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
No business and no registration. But very prestigious advanced degree and work experience, and excellent LS grades at non-T14.Anonymous User wrote:Were they bringing in business? Advanced degree or registration number?Anonymous User wrote:I know someone who successfully negotiated at 180K start with a V50. I had no idea that was even possible.
ETA: Edited the above, was too specific. Sorry. To poster below, thank you, much appreciated.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Sun Apr 29, 2012 8:45 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
Interesting. Thank you for responding.Anonymous User wrote:[redacted]Anonymous User wrote:Were they bringing in business? Advanced degree or registration number?Anonymous User wrote:I know someone who successfully negotiated at 180K start with a V50. I had no idea that was even possible.
[Edit: redacted in case you decide that was too much info]
- fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
you're not gonna tell us the firms?Anonymous User wrote:Along with at least 1 other ATL firm as well (the info isn't on NALP, was told in an interview by an associate), and I know of at least 1 regional biglaw firm in St. Louis that does the same thing for IP associates.Anonymous User wrote:See NALP directory for Kilpatrick Townsend (Atlanta).Anonymous User wrote:Such asJulio_El_Chavo wrote:There are non-top firms that already pay entry-level patent attorneys more than other entry level attorneys.
also, Alston Bird ATL NALP says "$160,000 base salary for Patent Bar members working in our IP area."
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
+1 to A&B. I know a breh working in one of their offices. They start at like 145K, but patent bar gives DAT 15K boost to 160K.
- fatduck
- Posts: 4135
- Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
160k in atlanta is a pretty sick salary. they pay that for all patent barred IP people, or just prosecutors?Big Shrimpin wrote:+1 to A&B. I know a breh working in one of their offices. They start at like 145K, but patent bar gives DAT 15K boost to 160K.
-
- Posts: 432579
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
Strong rumors of base rases at one big firm in NYC. All I can say. Keep hope alive.
- Big Shrimpin
- Posts: 2470
- Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 12:35 pm
Re: patent litigation to 180k?
I think it's anyone, IIRC. TSO jelly of my bro, because he's in a secondary/tertiary city with middle-of-the-road debt and will thus be BALLING out of control down there. LOLNYCFMLfatduck wrote:160k in atlanta is a pretty sick salary. they pay that for all patent barred IP people, or just prosecutors?Big Shrimpin wrote:+1 to A&B. I know a breh working in one of their offices. They start at like 145K, but patent bar gives DAT 15K boost to 160K.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login