Carroll McNulty Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 428565
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Carroll McNulty
Thoughts on this firm? (CMK.COM)... Salary info? Legit or shit law?
-
- Posts: 428565
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Carroll McNulty
Bumping this even though it's super old to avoid duplicity.
- Mozart Lacrimosa
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 1:01 pm
Re: Carroll McNulty
Also interested if anyone has heard things good/bad.
-
- Posts: 428565
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Carroll McNulty
Anonymous User wrote:Bumping this even though it's super old to avoid duplicity.
-
- Posts: 428565
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Carroll McNulty
Also interested. Anyone?Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Bumping this even though it's super old to avoid duplicity.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 428565
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Carroll McNulty
Anonymous User wrote:Also interested. Anyone?Anonymous User wrote:Anonymous User wrote:Bumping this even though it's super old to avoid duplicity.
- JCougar
- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Re: Carroll McNulty
Ummm....It's big-market insurance defense. Biglaw hours, about half the pay, no usable skills. I know someone who works there who is pretty thrilled, but that's because he started out doing even more boring insurance defense for even less in the boonies. He's now thrilled to work 90 hours a week for "almost" six figures.
-
- Posts: 428565
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Carroll McNulty
Thanks for the info! Does any of this change if working insurance coverage as opposed to insurance defense?JCougar wrote:Ummm....It's big-market insurance defense. Biglaw hours, about half the pay, no usable skills. I know someone who works there who is pretty thrilled, but that's because he started out doing even more boring insurance defense for even less in the boonies. He's now thrilled to work 90 hours a week for "almost" six figures.
-
- Posts: 428565
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Carroll McNulty
It's fine. I know a couple lawyers from BigLaw firms who washed out and ended up there. It's a lifestyle firm by BigLaw standards, but with worse hours than true lifestyle firms. At the end of the day, the key issue is that their rates are $200-300/hour, so they can't pay that much, nor work so little if they want to keep the lights on/
- JCougar
- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Re: Carroll McNulty
Coverage is definitely a step above ID. I mean, most Biglaw work of any kind is mind-numbingly boring BS. But yeah, it's not as prestigious as true Biglaw and therefore doesn't pay as well.Anonymous User wrote:Thanks for the info! Does any of this change if working insurance coverage as opposed to insurance defense?JCougar wrote:Ummm....It's big-market insurance defense. Biglaw hours, about half the pay, no usable skills. I know someone who works there who is pretty thrilled, but that's because he started out doing even more boring insurance defense for even less in the boonies. He's now thrilled to work 90 hours a week for "almost" six figures.