NY v. Calif. Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2011 5:00 pm
NY v. Calif.
Can anyone (preferably with knowledge of both places) discuss the differences between Biglaw litigation work in New York and California (particularly LA)? Assume no major preference for the location in itself (i.e., family connections, the weather, etc.). I'm most curious whether California firms (or California offices of firms from other cities) in general have more reasonable hours and work expectations. Thanks.
-
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 1:34 pm
Re: NY v. Calif.
A TLS classic - evaluate a hypothetical while ignoring the overwhelmingly determinative factor.pereatmundus wrote:Can anyone (preferably with knowledge of both places) discuss the differences between Biglaw litigation work in New York and California (particularly LA)? Assume no major preference for the location in itself (i.e., family connections, the weather, etc.). I'm most curious whether California firms (or California offices of firms from other cities) in general have more reasonable hours and work expectations. Thanks.
You will find dramatic differences between NYC and LA. First decide where you want to live, then evaluate firms against each other.
-
- Posts: 521
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:03 am
Re: NY v. Calif.
I agree with your point. At the same time, isn't it pretty widely discussed here that New York is just more of a workhorse city than others most of the time? In other words, wouldn't the average LA firm being a little more light handed than the average NY firm?c3pO4 wrote:A TLS classic - evaluate a hypothetical while ignoring the overwhelmingly determinative factor.pereatmundus wrote:Can anyone (preferably with knowledge of both places) discuss the differences between Biglaw litigation work in New York and California (particularly LA)? Assume no major preference for the location in itself (i.e., family connections, the weather, etc.). I'm most curious whether California firms (or California offices of firms from other cities) in general have more reasonable hours and work expectations. Thanks.
You will find dramatic differences between NYC and LA. First decide where you want to live, then evaluate firms against each other.
That's my perception of it.
- NoleinNY
- Posts: 1031
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 4:58 pm
Re: NY v. Calif.
Big Law is going to be demanding, regardless. Quinn Emmanuel, one of hardest working lit firms out there, was founded out here in Los Angeles (though you can wear flip flops to work, if that's your thing.)pereatmundus wrote:Can anyone (preferably with knowledge of both places) discuss the differences between Biglaw litigation work in New York and California (particularly LA)? Assume no major preference for the location in itself (i.e., family connections, the weather, etc.). I'm most curious whether California firms (or California offices of firms from other cities) in general have more reasonable hours and work expectations. Thanks.
NYC, IIRC, has more work (in terms of business, not interms of per-associate-hours) than LA. Some LA firms are anecdotally more "laid back," but if you are looking at the best of the best firms, they are all going to ask for the same, high amount of hours.
- Drake014
- Posts: 845
- Joined: Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:22 pm
Re: NY v. Calif.
Ranking of most to least demanding for the firm that I'm working for:pereatmundus wrote:Can anyone (preferably with knowledge of both places) discuss the differences between Biglaw litigation work in New York and California (particularly LA)? Assume no major preference for the location in itself (i.e., family connections, the weather, etc.). I'm most curious whether California firms (or California offices of firms from other cities) in general have more reasonable hours and work expectations. Thanks.
1. New York
2. LA
3. San Francisco
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login