Susman Godfrey Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432827
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Susman Godfrey
Is there a better firm for a young litigator?
I'm a 3L with a decent COA 2/9/7 clerkship next year. What does it take to get a job at this place? Which is the best office?
I'm a 3L with a decent COA 2/9/7 clerkship next year. What does it take to get a job at this place? Which is the best office?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432827
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Susman Godfrey
one of the toughest firms to get a job at...don't waste your time with them unless your SCOTUS material
- JusticeHarlan

- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
IBQRAnonymous User wrote:Is there a better firm for a young litigator?
- SleekFire

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:13 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
JusticeHarlan wrote:IBQRAnonymous User wrote:Is there a better firm for a young litigator?
IBQR?
-
TheFriendlyBarber

- Posts: 258
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:13 am
Re: Susman Godfrey
In Before Qaddafi's Resurrection?SleekFire wrote:JusticeHarlan wrote:IBQRAnonymous User wrote:Is there a better firm for a young litigator?
IBQR?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- SleekFire

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:13 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
lmao. But http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muammar_Gaddafi
He uses a "G," lol. Although I have seen a "K." Not "Q."
He uses a "G," lol. Although I have seen a "K." Not "Q."
-
mrloblaw

- Posts: 534
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 3:00 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
Now that he's dead, seriously Western World, let's agree on how to transliterate his name.SleekFire wrote:lmao. But http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muammar_Gaddafi
He uses a "G," lol. Although I have seen a "K." Not "Q."
-
TheFriendlyBarber

- Posts: 258
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:13 am
Re: Susman Godfrey
True, true, but phonetically it's Muʿammar al-QaḏḏāfīSleekFire wrote:lmao. But http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muammar_Gaddafi
He uses a "G," lol. Although I have seen a "K." Not "Q."
and also:
--LinkRemoved--
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-2 ... -says.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/21/world ... .html?_r=1
- SleekFire

- Posts: 120
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 10:13 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
Touche'TheFriendlyBarber wrote:True, true, but phonetically it's Muʿammar al-QaḏḏāfīSleekFire wrote:lmao. But http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muammar_Gaddafi
He uses a "G," lol. Although I have seen a "K." Not "Q."
and also:
--LinkRemoved--
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-10-2 ... -says.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/21/world ... .html?_r=1
- Helmholtz

- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
All I wanted to say is that the first two posts are by the exact same user.
-
Snooker

- Posts: 360
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 2:50 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
Susman will usually recruit from the very top of the class, and tends to look at more than just numbers (but they want high numbers, too). The full range of skills, personality traits, and attributes is highly important to them. In addition, they have a tradition of hiring people who were on editorial boards of well-known journals, especially those in leadership position (EIC, ME, etc.), and require you to have a clerkship lined up before you can be taken on full-time. Susman tends to be very comprehensive when looking at applicants. I am not sure if the SCOTUS claim is accurate, since they tend to get the very best well-rounded litigators they can. I came away with the impression that it's not the firm that will simply pick the highest GPA in front of them, but rather will pick someone they know will be a top litigator (and not just a good memo-drafter). Think all-star drafts, not test-taking nerds.
The summer program (in the past at least) is 4 weeks; a typical summer will be 6 weeks with one firm, 4 weeks with Susman, and the rest of your summer on editorial board work.
The summer program (in the past at least) is 4 weeks; a typical summer will be 6 weeks with one firm, 4 weeks with Susman, and the rest of your summer on editorial board work.
- stratocophic

- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
"your SCOTUS material"Helmholtz wrote:All I wanted to say is that the first two posts are by the exact same user.
DING
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432827
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Susman Godfrey
Helmholtz wrote:All I wanted to say is that the first two posts are by the exact same user.
OP also overstated the SCOTUS thing. I know two people who work there. They certainly have great credentials, but neither were near "SCOTUS material." They had great federal clerkships, but not with feeder type judges.
Susman is great, but so are Bartlit Beck, Kellogg Huber, Keker. Munger as well. I don't think there's a clear "best place" to be a young litigator.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432827
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Susman Godfrey
Susman is awesome, but it's not all about grades. People top 5% at HYS won't get a CB while folks barely top third will. They only take 6-8 summers a year; grades are important but not dispositive. They can be picky. And they are.
- IAFG

- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
looolHelmholtz wrote:All I wanted to say is that the first two posts are by the exact same user.
-
Curious1

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
How come they aren't on Vault?
- Grizz

- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
You are the most annoying 0L in the employment forum.Curious1 wrote:How come they aren't on Vault?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Blessedassurance

- Posts: 2091
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:42 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
Grizz wrote:You are the most annoying 0L inCurious1 wrote:How come they aren't on Vault?the employment forumgeneral.
-
Curious1

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
You are the most annoying poster on the entire forum.Grizz wrote:You are the most annoying 0L in the employment forum.Curious1 wrote:How come they aren't on Vault?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432827
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Susman Godfrey
Getting Susman is very, very hard. The initial grade threshold isn't that high. If you can get a WLRK callback, you have necessary grades to get a Susman callback. However, they take barely anyone, and my perception has been that you basically need to have a wilddog personality factor to get a job-- think The Office's James Spader-boss-type personality. Also, SAing does not mean you are getting a job my any means, I think they take less than 1/2 of the clerks they bring in.
- JusticeHarlan

- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
I know, right? I thought I could at least count on Grizz for a QR, but nope, he left me hanging.Curious1 wrote:You are the most annoying poster on the entire forum.Grizz wrote:You are the most annoying 0L in the employment forum.Curious1 wrote:How come they aren't on Vault?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Grizz

- Posts: 10564
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm
Re: Susman Godfrey
I didn't get itJusticeHarlan wrote:I know, right? I thought I could at least count on Grizz for a QR, but nope, he left me hanging.Curious1 wrote:You are the most annoying poster on the entire forum.Grizz wrote:You are the most annoying 0L in the employment forum.Curious1 wrote:How come they aren't on Vault?
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432827
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Susman Godfrey
I like how people on these threads assume those hired by S+G must be uber type-A or "wilddog" personalities. These people obviously have not met anyone hired by S+G.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432827
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Susman Godfrey
+1. I know a Susman SA and he/she is definitely not a Type A person. He/she has top grades and is well spoken, but not very social or aggressive.Anonymous User wrote:I like how people on these threads assume those hired by S+G must be uber type-A or "wilddog" personalities. These people obviously have not met anyone hired by S+G.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432827
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Susman Godfrey
what school?Anonymous User wrote:+1. I know a Susman SA and he/she is definitely not a Type A person. He/she has top grades and is well spoken, but not very social or aggressive.Anonymous User wrote:I like how people on these threads assume those hired by S+G must be uber type-A or "wilddog" personalities. These people obviously have not met anyone hired by S+G.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login