Help Plz - NYC firms Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432541
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Help Plz - NYC firms
Trying to decide which is better for IP:
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432541
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Help Plz - NYC firms
Unless you had offers from Fitz or Ropes NY, I'd say this is a fairly easy call for Kirkland.
-
Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Help Plz - NYC firms
I can understand Quinn and Kirkland, but why Davis Polk? They have only two partners in NYC who officially do "IP litigation," and judging from their profiles, neither of them really do IP litigation.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432541
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Help Plz - NYC firms
Kirkland, if you are 100% sure you want to do IP. If you're uncertain, DPW.
-
spondee
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 6:53 pm
Re: Help Plz - NYC firms
No, DPW forecloses the IP option. DPW if you're certain you don't want IP.Anonymous User wrote:Kirkland, if you are 100% sure you want to do IP. If you're uncertain, DPW.
Fresh Prince wrote:I can understand Quinn and Kirkland, but why Davis Polk? They have only two partners in NYC who officially do "IP litigation," and judging from their profiles, neither of them really do IP litigation.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432541
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Help Plz - NYC firms
DPW does a lot of IP in the Menlo Park office. (And a little in NY.)
-
Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Help Plz - NYC firms
Still... do they specialize in IP transactional or IP litigation?Anonymous User wrote:DPW does a lot of IP in the Menlo Park office. (And a little in NY.)
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432541
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Help Plz - NYC firms
Kirkland. I'm only familiar with their soft IP practice (although I've heard that their hard IP is amazing). They attract some of the best IP lawyers in the nation (Dale Cendali, Claudia Ray, etc.) who do some of the most interesting, high-profile IP litigation (the Harry Potter "Lexicon" case, Dastar, Associated Press v. Shepard Fairey (the Obama Hope Poster), etc.).
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432541
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Help Plz - NYC firms
They're actually better known for their hard IP (patent) practice. I read about big wins for Apple, Samsung, Intel this year in patent lit matters, for instance.Anonymous User wrote:Kirkland. I'm only familiar with their soft IP practice (although I've heard that their hard IP is amazing). They attract some of the best IP lawyers in the nation (Dale Cendali, Claudia Ray, etc.) who do some of the most interesting, high-profile IP litigation (the Harry Potter "Lexicon" case, Dastar, Associated Press v. Shepard Fairey (the Obama Hope Poster), etc.).
