Trying to decide which firm to head to. I'm pretty undecided on practice area. Want exposure to some regulatory practice groups, some corporate, maybe a bit of litigation.
From what I can tell, the amount of work is pretty similar. Latham may be a bit busier according to a few sources.
Don't really care that much about firm "culture". Have enjoyed most of the people I've met at both firms.
Would like to have mobility in my career, ability to move to different firms and offices in different cities.
Just curious to hear what others may do in this situation and why.
Skadden DC v. Latham DC Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 431705
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Skadden DC v. Latham DC
One of these firms lathamed their associates. The other is a better firm.
We report. You decide.
We report. You decide.
