Sullivan & Cromwell's recruiting process makes it to ATL Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
User avatar
quakeroats

Silver
Posts: 1397
Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:34 am

Sullivan & Cromwell's recruiting process makes it to ATL

Post by quakeroats » Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:13 pm

In a break from wall-to-wall UVA hijinks:

http://abovethelaw.com/2011/09/an-insid ... g-process/

User avatar
Bronte

Gold
Posts: 2125
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell's recruiting process makes it to ATL

Post by Bronte » Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:18 pm

Yeah, not particularly juicy. They gave about 15 CBs, which is great.

mrloblaw

Silver
Posts: 534
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 3:00 pm

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell's recruiting process makes it to ATL

Post by mrloblaw » Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:24 pm

I was expecting more, like: ding candidates who x, y, or z during the interview.

3/10.

User avatar
prezidentv8

Gold
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:33 am

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell's recruiting process makes it to ATL

Post by prezidentv8 » Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:25 pm

THE JUICINESS FACTOR INVOLVED HERE IS ABOUT A .05/10

User avatar
Helmholtz

Gold
Posts: 4128
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:48 pm

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell's recruiting process makes it to ATL

Post by Helmholtz » Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:28 pm

prezidentv8 wrote:THE JUICINESS FACTOR INVOLVED HERE IS ABOUT A .05/10
too high

User avatar
prezidentv8

Gold
Posts: 2823
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:33 am

Re: Sullivan & Cromwell's recruiting process makes it to ATL

Post by prezidentv8 » Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:30 pm

Helmholtz wrote:
prezidentv8 wrote:THE JUICINESS FACTOR INVOLVED HERE IS ABOUT A .05/10
too high
BUT THE SUPPOSEDLY SMART LAWYER FORGOT HIS BINDER!!!

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”