LA Litigation: Latham v. Irell Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Latham (LA) v. Irell (LA)

Poll ended at Fri Sep 23, 2011 11:58 pm

Latham (LA)
5
26%
Irell
14
74%
 
Total votes: 19

la.lawstudent.jd

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:31 pm

LA Litigation: Latham v. Irell

Post by la.lawstudent.jd » Wed Sep 21, 2011 11:58 pm

Interested in General Litigation; no particular interest in IP

zomginternets

Silver
Posts: 547
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 1:59 pm

Re: LA Litigation: Latham v. Irell

Post by zomginternets » Thu Sep 22, 2011 1:03 am

In before the Latham-hate.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428922
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: LA Litigation: Latham v. Irell

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:57 am

LATHAMMMM

User avatar
rayiner

Platinum
Posts: 6145
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: LA Litigation: Latham v. Irell

Post by rayiner » Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:20 am

Yeah... low leverage, huge bonuses, early substantive responsibility, versus the firm that spawned an internet meme.

Anonymous User
Posts: 428922
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: LA Litigation: Latham v. Irell

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:39 am

rayiner wrote:Yeah... low leverage, huge bonuses, early substantive responsibility, versus the firm that spawned an internet meme.

This. Not even a close call, OP. Go to Irell.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 428922
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: LA Litigation: Latham v. Irell

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:09 pm

Irell is good

la.lawstudent.jd

New
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:31 pm

Re: LA Litigation: Latham v. Irell

Post by la.lawstudent.jd » Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:06 pm

any more votes?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”