Cravath or W&C? Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Cravath or W&C?
For litigation, obviously. Remove hours worked and how nice the partners are rumored to be from the equation.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
- YourCaptain

- Posts: 721
- Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 11:26 pm
Re: Cravath or W&C?
If you're absolutely certain about litigation, then I would take W&C and would not think twice. Cravath's litigation dept is excellent but W&C is devoted to lit and has more unique opportunities. FYI, if this was Munger v. Cravath I would say Munger.
Cravath is superb but if you're very devoted to one particular practice then other firms are simply better.
Cravath is superb but if you're very devoted to one particular practice then other firms are simply better.
-
Renzo

- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Cravath or W&C?
Assuming you mean Williams & Connolly, it's a wash. They are both tremendous litigation shops, but they do very different kinds of work. If you can decide if you are more interested in securities/corporate governance litigation or regulatory/white collar/gov't investigations litigation, that should inform your choice.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath or W&C?
OP here. Agreed on practice areas informing choice. But as your response alludes to, it can be difficult to know your specific interests after 1L.Renzo wrote:Assuming you mean Williams & Connolly, it's a wash. They are both tremendous litigation shops, but they do very different kinds of work. If you can decide if you are more interested in securities/corporate governance litigation or regulatory/white collar/gov't investigations litigation, that should inform your choice.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath or W&C?
do you have an offer from W&C?Anonymous User wrote:OP here. Agreed on practice areas informing choice. But as your response alludes to, it can be difficult to know your specific interests after 1L.Renzo wrote:Assuming you mean Williams & Connolly, it's a wash. They are both tremendous litigation shops, but they do very different kinds of work. If you can decide if you are more interested in securities/corporate governance litigation or regulatory/white collar/gov't investigations litigation, that should inform your choice.
if so could you please tell me when your callback/offer was?
thanks
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath or W&C?
Still interested in thoughts on this.
-
Anonymous User
- Posts: 432834
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Cravath or W&C?
do you have an offer from W&C or are you speculating if you are given the opportunity?Anonymous User wrote:Still interested in thoughts on this.