Shearman & Sterling Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432632
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Shearman & Sterling
On their way down and out? Screamers who make all their associates miserable? They seem fabulous and nice and have the perfect mix of international practices to be my top choice, yet... can anyone address the 2 concerns I mentioned?
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Shearman & Sterling
I don't know enough about the second point, but I do know the first point is true. There is nothing to address. Look at the data, look at the rankings, look at the league tables, etc. Shearman has been in decline for a long, long while.
-
- Posts: 432632
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Shearman & Sterling
Globally or just in the US?Fresh Prince wrote:I don't know enough about the second point, but I do know the first point is true. There is nothing to address. Look at the data, look at the rankings, look at the league tables, etc. Shearman has been in decline for a long, long while.
- Old Gregg
- Posts: 5409
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Shearman & Sterling
In the US, of course. Globally, it never was a top firm to begin with, so there's technically nothing to decline from.Anonymous User wrote:Globally or just in the US?Fresh Prince wrote:I don't know enough about the second point, but I do know the first point is true. There is nothing to address. Look at the data, look at the rankings, look at the league tables, etc. Shearman has been in decline for a long, long while.
-
- Posts: 432632
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Shearman & Sterling
So its agreed that Shearman is not among the highest tier as it once was. What do people think of its future trajectory though? I mean its still a very stable firm with a lot of high level work. Do you guys think it'll stay about where it is now for the foreseeable future?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432632
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Shearman & Sterling
I can't speak of the NY office, but based on my perceptions the DC office was great - friendly people and laid back atmosphere, yelling not tolerated by managing partners.Anonymous User wrote:On their way down and out? Screamers who make all their associates miserable? They seem fabulous and nice and have the perfect mix of international practices to be my top choice, yet... can anyone address the 2 concerns I mentioned?
-
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:24 pm
Re: Shearman & Sterling
I don't think anyone knows. But as a general rule (with many exceptions), the nature of the legal market makes trends likely to continue.Anonymous User wrote:So its agreed that Shearman is not among the highest tier as it once was. What do people think of its future trajectory though? I mean its still a very stable firm with a lot of high level work. Do you guys think it'll stay about where it is now for the foreseeable future?
Shearman has lost some key clients and talented lawyers over the last couple of decades. Not to the point that its financial stability is in question (I don't think), but the overall caliber of the practice has declined. How do you fix this? Well, you need to either attract or train high quality partners who have or can attract high quality clients/work. But if you're a top partner, why would you want to work for Shearman, when presumably you can go to a reputationally "better" firm (and probably get compensated more as well). Similarly, you won't have as good native talent coming through the law school recruiting pipe.
This is why there is very little change at the top of the legal market - it's a chicken/egg problem where you need top talent to move up, but you need to move up to attract top talent. It's very hard to move up unless you (1) buy a bunch of top partners on the lateral market (which creates a whole other set of problems), (2) come up with some unique business model/culture to attract lawyers (i.e., Quinn or BSF), or (3) create a very successful model of developing talent internally (harder than it sounds).
So I have no idea if Shearman will continue to decline, stay where it is, or rebound. But I'd say at the very least the last possibility is pretty unlikely.
-
- Posts: 432632
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Shearman & Sterling
Where do they tend to go when leaving S&S - are there certain firms snapping up their talent and key clients?imchuckbass58 wrote:Shearman has lost some key clients and talented lawyers over the last couple of decades.
-
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:24 pm
Re: Shearman & Sterling
I don't think one place in particular. If you're interested, these articles are a pretty good summary:Anonymous User wrote:Where do they tend to go when leaving S&S - are there certain firms snapping up their talent and key clients?imchuckbass58 wrote:Shearman has lost some key clients and talented lawyers over the last couple of decades.
http://www.thelawyer.com/shearman-and-s ... 02.article
http://www.law.com/jsp/llf/PubArticleLL ... 0602710524