Chicago Biglaw Litigation Ranks Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 432016
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Chicago Biglaw Litigation Ranks
Need some feedback here, this topic has been bandied about on here a bit but not much lately.
Strictly in terms of general litigation, how would you rate the following firms in terms of overall prestige? All anecdotes are appreciated.
My understanding is that it goes
1. Kirkland
2. Mayer Brown
3. Sidley (would be #2 overall but probably #3 for litigation behind MB)
4. Winston
5. Jenner
Where would you place Schiff Hardin, Jones Day, Skadden, McDermott, Katten and others?
Thank you for the help.
Strictly in terms of general litigation, how would you rate the following firms in terms of overall prestige? All anecdotes are appreciated.
My understanding is that it goes
1. Kirkland
2. Mayer Brown
3. Sidley (would be #2 overall but probably #3 for litigation behind MB)
4. Winston
5. Jenner
Where would you place Schiff Hardin, Jones Day, Skadden, McDermott, Katten and others?
Thank you for the help.
-
- Posts: 432016
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Chicago Biglaw Litigation Ranks
forrest bump
-
- Posts: 432016
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Chicago Biglaw Litigation Ranks
http://www.chambersandpartners.com/USA/ ... 3#org_3580
Excluding Barlit Beck, a boutique, Jenner, Mayer Brown, and Kirkland appear to take the cake.
Excluding Barlit Beck, a boutique, Jenner, Mayer Brown, and Kirkland appear to take the cake.
- bjsesq
- Posts: 13320
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 3:02 am
Re: Chicago Biglaw Litigation Ranks
Going off what I know and not with the info in front of me: Winston is certainly not better than jenner in lit. Not even close, actually
-
- Posts: 432016
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Chicago Biglaw Litigation Ranks
really? perhaps it is just the dan webb show over there and little else? would you put jenner ahead of mayer brown?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 432016
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Chicago Biglaw Litigation Ranks
the chambers thing was very helpful, thank you for posting. jenner deserves more love than it gets, methinks.
-
- Posts: 432016
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Chicago Biglaw Litigation Ranks
If you were looking for overall strength in litigation I would say:
1. Kirkland
2. Sidley
3. Winston
4. Mayer (unless interested in appellate, then I would say #1)
5. Jenner
Also keep in mind that Jenner is the only one of these to not pay market past the first year and pay sub-market bonuses.
ETA: Obviously excludes BB.
1. Kirkland
2. Sidley
3. Winston
4. Mayer (unless interested in appellate, then I would say #1)
5. Jenner
Also keep in mind that Jenner is the only one of these to not pay market past the first year and pay sub-market bonuses.
ETA: Obviously excludes BB.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Thu Aug 25, 2011 10:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432016
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am