CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!! Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 am
Re: CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!!
IAFG wrote:...total SA spots.

Ouch.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!!
Mayer Chicago just gives up hiring anybody, looking to fill first-year spots on the lateral market.
- BackToTheOldHouse
- Posts: 862
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:03 pm
Re: CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!!
Is this good or bad? Context, if you will.
-
- Posts: 432595
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!!
Truth.rayiner wrote:Mayer Chicago just gives up hiring anybody, looking to fill first-year spots on the lateral market.
I would avoid Mayer. It has been in steady decline since Refco. Same goes for Jenner. Chicago-based firms are pretty TTT.
ETA: Mayer actually makes their SAs work too. Most of them worked like 8-8 this summer from what I hear. The horror.
Last edited by Anonymous User on Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dresden doll
- Posts: 6797
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:11 am
Re: CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!!
Not sure if srs.BackToTheOldHouse wrote:Is this good or bad? Context, if you will.
- IAFG
- Posts: 6641
- Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:26 pm
Re: CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!!
Back when we still had an economy, "NYC to $190k" was a meme. I am poking fun at the lack of Chicago recovery.BackToTheOldHouse wrote:Is this good or bad? Context, if you will.
- BackToTheOldHouse
- Posts: 862
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:03 pm
Re: CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!!
Ahh, I get it. I was serious in that I have never paid any attention to the SA class size in Chicago.IAFG wrote:Back when we still had an economy, "NYC to $190k" was a meme. I am poking fun at the lack of Chicago recovery.BackToTheOldHouse wrote:Is this good or bad? Context, if you will.
-
- Posts: 1230
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 10:58 pm
Re: CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!!
I am skeptical that Chicago and Illinois in general will be able to recover as fast as the other markets.
Illinois decided to increase corporate and personal taxes in order to deal with its latest budget deficit:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/13/us/13illinois.html.
This move has definitely angered large businesses. Some major businesses including Caterpillar and CME group have been threatening to leave the state. http://www.wbez.org/story/business-grou ... axes-89358
Why would a national law firm hire more associates in a place that has recently become unfriendly to its biggest customers, large corporations?
Illinois decided to increase corporate and personal taxes in order to deal with its latest budget deficit:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/13/us/13illinois.html.
This move has definitely angered large businesses. Some major businesses including Caterpillar and CME group have been threatening to leave the state. http://www.wbez.org/story/business-grou ... axes-89358
Why would a national law firm hire more associates in a place that has recently become unfriendly to its biggest customers, large corporations?
-
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:45 am
Re: CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!!
Kirkland is not sure if serious.Anonymous User wrote:Truth.rayiner wrote:Mayer Chicago just gives up hiring anybody, looking to fill first-year spots on the lateral market.
I would avoid Mayer. It has been in steady decline since Refco. Same goes for Jenner. Chicago-based firms are pretty TTT.
ETA: Mayer actually makes their SAs work too. Most of them worked like 8-8 this summer from what I hear. The horror.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!!
The can threaten to leave, but taxes here are still low compared to other US financial centers.shoeshine wrote:I am skeptical that Chicago and Illinois in general will be able to recover as fast as the other markets.
Illinois decided to increase corporate and personal taxes in order to deal with its latest budget deficit:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/13/us/13illinois.html.
This move has definitely angered large businesses. Some major businesses including Caterpillar and CME group have been threatening to leave the state. http://www.wbez.org/story/business-grou ... axes-89358
Why would a national law firm hire more associates in a place that has recently become unfriendly to its biggest customers, large corporations?
-
- Posts: 432595
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!!
ToTransferOrNot wrote:Kirkland is not sure if serious.Anonymous User wrote:Truth.rayiner wrote:Mayer Chicago just gives up hiring anybody, looking to fill first-year spots on the lateral market.
I would avoid Mayer. It has been in steady decline since Refco. Same goes for Jenner. Chicago-based firms are pretty TTT.
ETA: Mayer actually makes their SAs work too. Most of them worked like 8-8 this summer from what I hear. The horror.
TBF, Kirkland is not TTT. Sidley probably isn't either. The next 4 "good" Chicago firms: Winston, Mayer, Jenner, and McDermott are all TTT to varying degrees.
- rayiner
- Posts: 6145
- Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am
Re: CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!!
Kirkland is pwning, but is being helped along by its Chicago competitors completely shitting the bed.ToTransferOrNot wrote:Kirkland is not sure if serious.Anonymous User wrote:Truth.rayiner wrote:Mayer Chicago just gives up hiring anybody, looking to fill first-year spots on the lateral market.
I would avoid Mayer. It has been in steady decline since Refco. Same goes for Jenner. Chicago-based firms are pretty TTT.
ETA: Mayer actually makes their SAs work too. Most of them worked like 8-8 this summer from what I hear. The horror.
-
- Posts: 432595
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: CHICAGO TO 190!!!!!!
rayiner wrote:
Kirkland is pwning, but is being helped along by its Chicago competitors completely shitting the bed.
Truth.
That being said, Kirkland is not THE firm for EVERY field in Chicago. If you are interested in some of the smaller groups, going to Kirkland is definitely the wrong choice.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login