UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results Forum

(On Campus Interviews, Summer Associate positions, Firm Reviews, Tips, ...)
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting

Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.

Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:41 pm

Serves him right.

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:48 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Serves him right.
Seriously? First, I doubt he cares, second, why do people feel the need to forward shit like this to ATL? It might not have been the most tactful email ever, but I'm certain he didn't intend any harm by it.

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:50 pm

Out of curiosity, is there actually a way to unsubscribe from lawannounce?

User avatar
JollyGreenGiant

Silver
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by JollyGreenGiant » Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:50 pm

Egh... He's one of the better dudes at the law school. It was a misguided e-mail, but it's already overblown. Time to let it go...

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:53 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Serves him right.
Seriously? First, I doubt he cares, second, why do people feel the need to forward shit like this to ATL? It might not have been the most tactful email ever, but I'm certain he didn't intend any harm by it.

I'm not so certain of that.

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:53 pm

JollyGreenGiant wrote:Egh... He's one of the better dudes at the law school. It was a misguided e-mail, but it's already overblown. Time to let it go...
LOL.

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 2:57 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Out of curiosity, is there actually a way to unsubscribe from lawannounce?
Yeah, I think you have to email Aaron Rester. But if you have gmail you can just filter it into a folder and have it skip your inbox.

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:02 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Out of curiosity, is there actually a way to unsubscribe from lawannounce?
Yeah, I think you have to email Aaron Rester. But if you have gmail you can just filter it into a folder and have it skip your inbox.
excellent ty.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 3:55 pm

My rejection from Kirkland NY just came in. It started with:
Dear Xxxxxxxxxx:

We were pleased to have the opportunity to talk with you during on-campus interviews at Brooklyn Law School's Interview Program. Thank you for taking the time to meet with us.
:|

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:01 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Serves him right.
Seriously? First, I doubt he cares, second, why do people feel the need to forward shit like this to ATL? It might not have been the most tactful email ever, but I'm certain he didn't intend any harm by it.
Agreed. Whoever sent that in is an asshole.

jaymoney

New
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 4:35 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by jaymoney » Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:03 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Serves him right.
Seriously? First, I doubt he cares, second, why do people feel the need to forward shit like this to ATL? It might not have been the most tactful email ever, but I'm certain he didn't intend any harm by it.

I'm not so certain of that.
I think it was a poor choice to send it to ATL. If you're upset with it, go talk to him. He's a good guy, creating this drama is unnecessary and petty.

User avatar
Emma.

Gold
Posts: 2408
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Emma. » Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:13 pm

jaymoney wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:Serves him right.
Seriously? First, I doubt he cares, second, why do people feel the need to forward shit like this to ATL? It might not have been the most tactful email ever, but I'm certain he didn't intend any harm by it.

I'm not so certain of that.
I think it was a poor choice to send it to ATL. If you're upset with it, go talk to him. He's a good guy, creating this drama is unnecessary and petty.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:23 pm

Anonymous User wrote:My rejection from Kirkland NY just came in. It started with:
Dear Xxxxxxxxxx:

We were pleased to have the opportunity to talk with you during on-campus interviews at Brooklyn Law School's Interview Program. Thank you for taking the time to meet with us.
:|
Me too. Fucking idiots.

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 4:59 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:My rejection from Kirkland NY just came in. It started with:
Dear Xxxxxxxxxx:

We were pleased to have the opportunity to talk with you during on-campus interviews at Brooklyn Law School's Interview Program. Thank you for taking the time to meet with us.
:|
Me too. Fucking idiots.
I just received the same snail mail ding from Kirkland, but they got my school correct. Of course, I never interviewed with them.

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:38 pm

Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:My rejection from Kirkland NY just came in. It started with:
Dear Xxxxxxxxxx:

We were pleased to have the opportunity to talk with you during on-campus interviews at Brooklyn Law School's Interview Program. Thank you for taking the time to meet with us.
:|
Me too. Fucking idiots.
I just received the same snail mail ding from Kirkland, but they got my school correct. Of course, I never interviewed with them.
haha, what the hell is going on over there?

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:51 pm

Anonymous User wrote: I just received the same snail mail ding from Kirkland, but they got my school correct. Of course, I never interviewed with them.
Directed by M. Night Shyamalan

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:52 pm

did anyone else's Cooley ding refer to it as a clerkship? I thought that was weird.

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 5:54 pm

Anonymous User wrote:did anyone else's Cooley ding refer to it as a clerkship? I thought that was weird.
This is actually a pretty common way to refer to summer jobs. I'm not sure if it is older or regional usage, but I've heard it a fair amount.

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 6:03 pm

Bryan Cave NY ding via snail.
Started applying for PI jobs today. Feel like a 1L again. :evil: :cry:

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Thu Sep 22, 2011 7:14 pm

Anonymous User wrote:did anyone else's Cooley ding refer to it as a clerkship? I thought that was weird.
post-CB?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
TaipeiMort

Silver
Posts: 869
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by TaipeiMort » Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:16 am

I think it was a poor choice to send it to ATL. If you're upset with it, go talk to him. He's a good guy, creating this drama is unnecessary and petty.
Yeah. I didn't really care because he is a nice guy and I don't think meant anything bad by it. I can understand though how someone sitting on no offers would be pissed at him.

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:15 pm

Any movement today?

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:21 pm

TaipeiMort wrote:
I think it was a poor choice to send it to ATL. If you're upset with it, go talk to him. He's a good guy, creating this drama is unnecessary and petty.
Yeah. I didn't really care because he is a nice guy and I don't think meant anything bad by it. I can understand though how someone sitting on no offers would be pissed at him.
glad you saw that.

Anonymous User
Posts: 431120
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am

Re: UChicago 2011 OCI Discussion and Results

Post by Anonymous User » Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:26 pm

Anonymous User wrote:Any movement today?
I'll be declining offers at a few chicago firms, hopefully will free up some movement for others still waiting.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply Post Anonymous Reply  

Return to “Legal Employment”