Media/First Amendment law Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 421226
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Media/First Amendment law
Where should I be applying if I want to do this in New York or DC? I know it's a tough practice area to crack, but assume I have the grades and credentials to have a shot.
- Bronte
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm
Re: Media/First Amendment law
These are two pretty disparate practice areas, and extremely niche/rare. Anything involving con law is mostly going to go on in DC as far as I know, which is the hotbed of appellate practice. Media law on the other hand is just... I don't know. If you have the grades, I would recommend broadening your expressed preference to appellate litigation generally and applying to NY and DC firms that have strong practices in those areas.
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:10 pm
Re: Media/First Amendment law
They aren't disparate at all, they're pretty commonly understood to go hand in hand. The primary places for this would be NYC and LA, i.e. the major media capitals of the U.S. The firms that come to mind off the top of my head in NYC are Davis Wright Tremaine, Gibson Dunn, Patterson Belknap, Cahill Gordon, and maybe Boise Schiller. To find others, check the Chambers & Partners list of the top media & entertainment litigators in New York, and apply to whatever firms they're at. Good luck!Bronte wrote:These are two pretty disparate practice areas, and extremely niche/rare. Anything involving con law is mostly going to go on in DC as far as I know, which is the hotbed of appellate practice. Media law on the other hand is just... I don't know. If you have the grades, I would recommend broadening your expressed preference to appellate litigation generally and applying to NY and DC firms that have strong practices in those areas.
ETA: In DC you'll want to apply to Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz.
Last edited by citydweller09 on Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Bronte
- Posts: 2125
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:44 pm
Re: Media/First Amendment law
Yeah I'll concede to being wrong there. I see how they would obviously go hand in hand. Still think you should broaden your focus, but if you have the credentials go for it.citydweller09 wrote:They aren't disparate at all, they're pretty commonly understood to go hand in hand. The primary places for this would be NYC and LA, i.e. the major media capitals of the U.S. The firms that come to mind off the top of my head in NYC are Davis Wright Tremaine, Gibson Dunn, Patterson Belknap, Cahill Gordon, and maybe Boise Schiller. To find others, check the Chambers & Partners list of the top media & entertainment litigators in New York, and apply to whatever firms they're at. Good luck!Bronte wrote:These are two pretty disparate practice areas, and extremely niche/rare. Anything involving con law is mostly going to go on in DC as far as I know, which is the hotbed of appellate practice. Media law on the other hand is just... I don't know. If you have the grades, I would recommend broadening your expressed preference to appellate litigation generally and applying to NY and DC firms that have strong practices in those areas.
-
- Posts: 1245
- Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 3:24 pm
Re: Media/First Amendment law
This is pretty accurate.citydweller09 wrote: The firms that come to mind off the top of my head in NYC are Davis Wright Tremaine, Gibson Dunn, Patterson Belknap, Cahill Gordon, and maybe Boise Schiller.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:13 am
Re: Media/First Amendment law
Jack & Balkin LLP
- jonas
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 6:25 pm
Re: Media/First Amendment law
Jenner & Block, too.citydweller09 wrote:They aren't disparate at all, they're pretty commonly understood to go hand in hand. The primary places for this would be NYC and LA, i.e. the major media capitals of the U.S. The firms that come to mind off the top of my head in NYC are Davis Wright Tremaine, Gibson Dunn, Patterson Belknap, Cahill Gordon, and maybe Boise Schiller. To find others, check the Chambers & Partners list of the top media & entertainment litigators in New York, and apply to whatever firms they're at. Good luck!Bronte wrote:These are two pretty disparate practice areas, and extremely niche/rare. Anything involving con law is mostly going to go on in DC as far as I know, which is the hotbed of appellate practice. Media law on the other hand is just... I don't know. If you have the grades, I would recommend broadening your expressed preference to appellate litigation generally and applying to NY and DC firms that have strong practices in those areas.
ETA: In DC you'll want to apply to Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz.
http://www.jenner.com/practice/practice ... .asp?ID=47
-
- Posts: 421226
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Media/First Amendment law
Hahahah -- much as I love JB I doubt he's hiring. Thanks for the advice, TLS. This confirms much of what I've heard elsewhere (including on the Chambers website).TheFriendlyBarber wrote:Jack & Balkin LLP
-
- Posts: 421226
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Media/First Amendment law
FYI Levine Sullivan is also in New York.citydweller09 wrote:They aren't disparate at all, they're pretty commonly understood to go hand in hand. The primary places for this would be NYC and LA, i.e. the major media capitals of the U.S. The firms that come to mind off the top of my head in NYC are Davis Wright Tremaine, Gibson Dunn, Patterson Belknap, Cahill Gordon, and maybe Boise Schiller. To find others, check the Chambers & Partners list of the top media & entertainment litigators in New York, and apply to whatever firms they're at. Good luck!Bronte wrote:These are two pretty disparate practice areas, and extremely niche/rare. Anything involving con law is mostly going to go on in DC as far as I know, which is the hotbed of appellate practice. Media law on the other hand is just... I don't know. If you have the grades, I would recommend broadening your expressed preference to appellate litigation generally and applying to NY and DC firms that have strong practices in those areas.
ETA: In DC you'll want to apply to Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz.
-
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 6:01 pm
Re: Media/First Amendment law
Yeah, Cahill has Floyd Abrams, who seems to be involved in like every blockbuster 1st Amendment case.citydweller09 wrote:They aren't disparate at all, they're pretty commonly understood to go hand in hand. The primary places for this would be NYC and LA, i.e. the major media capitals of the U.S. The firms that come to mind off the top of my head in NYC are Davis Wright Tremaine, Gibson Dunn, Patterson Belknap, Cahill Gordon, and maybe Boise Schiller. To find others, check the Chambers & Partners list of the top media & entertainment litigators in New York, and apply to whatever firms they're at. Good luck!Bronte wrote:These are two pretty disparate practice areas, and extremely niche/rare. Anything involving con law is mostly going to go on in DC as far as I know, which is the hotbed of appellate practice. Media law on the other hand is just... I don't know. If you have the grades, I would recommend broadening your expressed preference to appellate litigation generally and applying to NY and DC firms that have strong practices in those areas.
ETA: In DC you'll want to apply to Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz.
-
- Posts: 421226
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Media/First Amendment law
FYI Davis Wright Tremaine and Levine Sullivan only hire laterals.
-
- Posts: 421226
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Media/First Amendment law
Actually not true for either -- they hire summer associates.Anonymous User wrote:FYI Davis Wright Tremaine and Levine Sullivan only hire laterals.
-
- Posts: 421226
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Media/First Amendment law
This is accurate. However, it should be noted that the NYC office of DWT only hires one summer associate, and it's always a 1L. This is specifically because they don't extend permanent offers to summer associates for this office because it's so small.Anonymous User wrote:Actually not true for either -- they hire summer associates.Anonymous User wrote:FYI Davis Wright Tremaine and Levine Sullivan only hire laterals.
- IzziesGal
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:11 pm
Re: Media/First Amendment law
Um, Cahill Gordon should be the first and only name that pops into your head. Floyd Abrams is a partner there and he argued Citizens United and the Pentagon Papers case before the Supreme Court. Not to mention he represents countless reporters in cases where they are being subpoened to protect their confidential sources. He represented Judith Miller and was even in a movie about reporter's privilege. NY Times is a HUGE client of theirs.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login