Let's Talk About Boston Firms Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:23 am
Let's Talk About Boston Firms
Looking for the unreported low-down on the following firms' Boston offices. Share what information you have in regards to grade selectivity, geographic openness (ie lacking ties to Boston) and URM boosts. Additionally discuss quality of life at the firms and financial stability (ie are they going to tank in the next few years). Obviously these firms vary in size and I didn't include a few of the IP specific firms, but if you have info on those feel free to share too.
Banner & Witcoff
Bingham
Brown Rudnick
Choate Hall
Cooley
Dechert
dla piper
Edwards Angell
Fish & Richardson
Foley & Lardner
foley hoag
Goodwin Procter
Goulston & Storrs
Hinckley Allen & Snyder
Holland & Knight
K&L Gates
Latham
McDermott Will & Emery
Mintz Levin
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
Nixon Peabody
Nutter, McClennen & Fish
Proskauer
Ropes
Seyfarth Shaw
Skadden
Sullivan & Worcester
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers
Weil Gotshal
WilmerHale
Banner & Witcoff
Bingham
Brown Rudnick
Choate Hall
Cooley
Dechert
dla piper
Edwards Angell
Fish & Richardson
Foley & Lardner
foley hoag
Goodwin Procter
Goulston & Storrs
Hinckley Allen & Snyder
Holland & Knight
K&L Gates
Latham
McDermott Will & Emery
Mintz Levin
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
Nixon Peabody
Nutter, McClennen & Fish
Proskauer
Ropes
Seyfarth Shaw
Skadden
Sullivan & Worcester
Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers
Weil Gotshal
WilmerHale
-
- Posts: 432622
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
- Posts: 432622
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
-
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:23 am
Re: Let's Talk About Boston Firms
For what it's worth I've heard that LGBT is a decent boost in Boston generally but I can't speak to specific firms.
-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Let's Talk About Boston Firms
I've heard this, too. However, the person I heard it from emphasized that he thought the reason was that being LGBT made it easier for someone without ties to Boston to make the case for Boston. That will be harder now that NYC has gay marriage as well and nondiscrimination laws are more common.Aston2412 wrote:For what it's worth I've heard that LGBT is a decent boost in Boston generally but I can't speak to specific firms.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 5:14 pm
Re: Let's Talk About Boston Firms
What firms have largest classes?
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: Let's Talk About Boston Firms
Ropes, Wilmer, Goodwin are the big three. Bigham was once in that group but hired around five summers last year (for one of their largest offices).Headybrah wrote:What firms have largest classes?
-
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 11:03 am
Re: Let's Talk About Boston Firms
Ropes has ~60 in Boston this summer. I'm not sure about Wilmer or Goodwin. It's my understanding that Bingham had around 20 last summer (but not all got offers) and only has 6 this summer.timbs4339 wrote:Ropes, Wilmer, Goodwin are the big three. Bigham was once in that group but hired around five summers last year (for one of their largest offices).Headybrah wrote:What firms have largest classes?
I'd bet the rest of the firms on your list have between 0 and 15.
- 20121109
- Posts: 1611
- Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:19 pm
- Mattalones
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 8:18 pm
Re: Let's Talk About Boston Firms
I looked at every associate profile in the Boston office. Almost all had latin honors or a journal position from BC, BU, or other T14 school, but almost none were AA or MexA (I actually don't recall any).GAIAtheCHEERLEADER wrote:WilmerHale stats
-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Let's Talk About Boston Firms
According to NALP, they have 2 Hispanic associates and 3 black associates in Boston, as well as 3 black partners and 1 Hispanic partner, and 2 black SAs (no Hispanic SAs). Not impressive for an office of 300 lawyers.Mattalones wrote:I looked at every associate profile in the Boston office. Almost all had latin honors or a journal position from BC, BU, or other T14 school, but almost none were AA or MexA (I actually don't recall any).GAIAtheCHEERLEADER wrote:WilmerHale stats
Last edited by BenJ on Thu Jul 07, 2011 6:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:23 am
Re: Let's Talk About Boston Firms
Coincidentally, those three also have some of the highest grade requirements. Bingham is pretty up there too, but not quite as high as the others.
I know some of the others on the list have decent class sizes. Brown Rudnick had 20 in 2010 - that's not huge but it's not really small either.
Also, I've heard Wilmer can be law review whores - note that this doesn't pertain to the Boston office but might still be useful. In 2008, for their 09' summer, the only people they interviewed from GW were all Law Review.
I know some of the others on the list have decent class sizes. Brown Rudnick had 20 in 2010 - that's not huge but it's not really small either.
Also, I've heard Wilmer can be law review whores - note that this doesn't pertain to the Boston office but might still be useful. In 2008, for their 09' summer, the only people they interviewed from GW were all Law Review.
Last edited by Aston2412 on Thu Jul 07, 2011 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 432622
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk About Boston Firms
I heard Brown Rudnick is a sweatshop.Aston2412 wrote:Coincidentally, those three also have some of the highest grade requirements. Bingham is pretty up there too, but not quite as high as the others.
I know some of the others on the list have decent class sizes. Brown Rudnick had 20 in 2010 - that's not huge but it's not really small either.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Mattalones
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2006 8:18 pm
Re: Let's Talk About Boston Firms
I heard all BigLaw firms are sweatshops.Anonymous User wrote:I heard Brown Rudnick is a sweatshop.Aston2412 wrote:Coincidentally, those three also have some of the highest grade requirements. Bingham is pretty up there too, but not quite as high as the others.
I know some of the others on the list have decent class sizes. Brown Rudnick had 20 in 2010 - that's not huge but it's not really small either.
- 20121109
- Posts: 1611
- Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:19 pm
Re: Let's Talk About Boston Firms
Yeah...black/hispanic associates are just not too populous in Boston. I wouldn't say the dearth of diversity is specific to any one office in particular. Having a lot would be the exception rather than the norm.BenJ wrote:According to NALP, they have 2 Hispanic associates and 3 black associates in Boston, as well as 3 black partners and 1 Hispanic partner, and 2 black SAs (no Hispanic SAs). Not impressive for an office of 300 lawyers.Mattalones wrote:I looked at every associate profile in the Boston office. Almost all had latin honors or a journal position from BC, BU, or other T14 school, but almost none were AA or MexA (I actually don't recall any).GAIAtheCHEERLEADER wrote:WilmerHale stats
-
- Posts: 432622
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:32 am
Re: Let's Talk About Boston Firms
We're calling BR BigLaw now? Maybe BigTobacco (fees)...Mattalones wrote:I heard all BigLaw firms are sweatshops.Anonymous User wrote:I heard Brown Rudnick is a sweatshop.Aston2412 wrote:Coincidentally, those three also have some of the highest grade requirements. Bingham is pretty up there too, but not quite as high as the others.
I know some of the others on the list have decent class sizes. Brown Rudnick had 20 in 2010 - that's not huge but it's not really small either.
-
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:23 am
Re: Let's Talk About Boston Firms
They got 200+ attorneys and they pay 160k. That's BigLaw enough for me.Anonymous User wrote:
We're calling BR BigLaw now? Maybe BigTobacco (fees)...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login