My second question is about the actual form of sending this information. Wouldn't email to the recruiting office be more efficient and preferred by firms over receiving envelopes via snail mail?
Please help me with these mass mailings

Many firms list on their web sites what form they prefer. Go by that.anonymcoffee wrote: My second question is about the actual form of sending this information. Wouldn't email to the recruiting office be more efficient and preferred by firms over receiving envelopes via snail mail?
You got a sample one here... http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=156659anonymcoffee wrote:Does anyone have any example of that mass mailing they used in the past that has resulted in some interviews? I know there are a lot of variables at play but I would like to see some samples. My email is lawschool123@yahoo.com.
My second question is about the actual form of sending this information. Wouldn't email to the recruiting office be more efficient and preferred by firms over receiving envelopes via snail mail?
Please help me with these mass mailings
I couldn't send out a cover letter without at least a small bit of tailoring. I need to put in at least one fact that clearly isn't just a cut-and-paste thing. Sure, they may just go straight to resume, but the enthusiasm and research you show can certainly make a difference. A blanket resume bombing might be quick and easy, but taking some more time and doing some tailoring will likely increase your chances. I've been sending them out one by one all weekend so that they are just waiting in the inbox on Monday morning.anonymcoffee wrote:how many firms is enough to qualify as mass mailing - is this just like a hundred resume drops...? Are you guys just changing the law firm name in the cover letter or actually including a sentence or two relevant to the firm?
Sorry, i'm so confused about this whole mass mailing - it seems like a different process from various posts I'm reading. At GW we have a resume drop, should I be using that rather than mass mail? the resume drop seems like such a black hole
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Whatever a "resume drop is" don't expect much form it. Mass mailing is just a term, my mass mail last year was for 5 firms. There's no "minimum" but if you want to be employed I would air on the side of "a lot of firms" rather than "less than a lot of firms." A cover letter customized to each firm would be ideal, but since nobody has time for that, just do what you can.anonymcoffee wrote:how many firms is enough to qualify as mass mailing - is this just like a hundred resume drops...? Are you guys just changing the law firm name in the cover letter or actually including a sentence or two relevant to the firm?
Sorry, i'm so confused about this whole mass mailing - it seems like a different process from various posts I'm reading. At GW we have a resume drop, should I be using that rather than mass mail? the resume drop seems like such a black hole
Always. Always send transcript, resume, and cover letter. There are some strategies where alternatives are suggested, but looking for a 2L summer position there's no way around it.anonymcoffee wrote:should I include my transcript?
Always to the recruiting person.anonymcoffee wrote:Also, should I send it to the recruiting person or to an alum (that I've never interacted w/)?
I live to serve.anonymcoffee wrote:thanks again for the advice! and for helping through my 1 am freakout mode when reading all of TLS has mass mailed
thesealocust wrote:Always. Always send transcript, resume, and cover letter. There are some strategies where alternatives are suggested, but looking for a 2L summer position there's no way around it.anonymcoffee wrote:should I include my transcript?
Always to the recruiting person.anonymcoffee wrote:Also, should I send it to the recruiting person or to an alum (that I've never interacted w/)?
I sort of agree with the question - if you are all A's and A-'s, not sure that it means much. I imagine in that case it doesn't mean much, but could maybe mean something if say you have 3 A+'s which offset a B in legal writing.polycom01 wrote:thesealocust wrote:Always. Always send transcript, resume, and cover letter. There are some strategies where alternatives are suggested, but looking for a 2L summer position there's no way around it.anonymcoffee wrote:should I include my transcript?
Always to the recruiting person.anonymcoffee wrote:Also, should I send it to the recruiting person or to an alum (that I've never interacted w/)?
I am perplexed by this. If my resume shows my GPA and rank, why are the firms that concerned with a transcript? If I'm in the top 5% of the class, does the employer really care whether I got an A in contracts and an A- in civ pro?
It seems like solid advice to include it, and I probably will, but it just seems that the firms will be mostly concerned with GPA/Rank and less interested in how the grades were distributed.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
No.Anonymous User wrote:So is it acceptable to mass mail firms that are coming to OCI if the system is all lottery?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Can it say "UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT" on it? Or do I need to request an official transcript and then scan it into a .pdf?thesealocust wrote:They don't care how they're distributed, but you will never be hired without them seeing your transcript, because we do not live in a world of trust. To that end, it's less obnoxious for them to get it at first contact than to be in a position of having to request it later on. I'm not saying you need to include your transcript because it contains particular information necessary to their evaluation of your candidacy beyond the information you might self report, I'm saying that you'll have to give them a transcript at some point so why not now.
It's a bit different after graduation or for lateral moves, when I think leaving the transcript out might be a wiser choice. But for second year summer programs I am of the opinion it's a defacto requirement. Your first year grades are going to be important, there's not any way around it. If you have a truly exceptional situation, like the above poster mentioned, it's fine to try an alternative strategy. But I know for a fact that resume + transcript + cover letter is the standard, and I know for a fact at least the recruiters at my firm would roll their eyes at an application that lacked a transcript. It's part of the package (I stress, for 2L summer recruiting. Different ballgame for post-graduation jobs and the like).
Unofficial transcripts are fine.polycom01 wrote:Can it say "UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT" on it? Or do I need to request an official transcript and then scan it into a .pdf?thesealocust wrote:They don't care how they're distributed, but you will never be hired without them seeing your transcript, because we do not live in a world of trust. To that end, it's less obnoxious for them to get it at first contact than to be in a position of having to request it later on. I'm not saying you need to include your transcript because it contains particular information necessary to their evaluation of your candidacy beyond the information you might self report, I'm saying that you'll have to give them a transcript at some point so why not now.
It's a bit different after graduation or for lateral moves, when I think leaving the transcript out might be a wiser choice. But for second year summer programs I am of the opinion it's a defacto requirement. Your first year grades are going to be important, there's not any way around it. If you have a truly exceptional situation, like the above poster mentioned, it's fine to try an alternative strategy. But I know for a fact that resume + transcript + cover letter is the standard, and I know for a fact at least the recruiters at my firm would roll their eyes at an application that lacked a transcript. It's part of the package (I stress, for 2L summer recruiting. Different ballgame for post-graduation jobs and the like).
Yep.PirateCap'n wrote:Unofficial transcripts are fine.
But what about the 50 or so firms im not bidding on? Im still very interested in a number of them.thesealocust wrote:No.Anonymous User wrote:So is it acceptable to mass mail firms that are coming to OCI if the system is all lottery?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Doesn't matter. By not bidding them you're sending them a clear message that your "interest" in their firm doesn't even put them in your top 30-50 (however many bids you get). And yeah, it kinda sucks.Anonymous User wrote:But what about the 50 or so firms im not bidding on? Im still very interested in a number of them.thesealocust wrote:No.Anonymous User wrote:So is it acceptable to mass mail firms that are coming to OCI if the system is all lottery?
Yep. Going to a school with lottery OCI has costs and benefits to firms and students. As a benefit you are guaranteed a good number of face to face interviews, as a cost you limit your total number of applications. I would bet all the money I have or will have that this is a net benefit for people with less than perfect credentials, so I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.Anonymous User wrote:Doesn't matter. By not bidding them you're sending them a clear message that your "interest" in their firm doesn't even put them in your top 30-50 (however many bids you get). And yeah, it kinda sucks.Anonymous User wrote:But what about the 50 or so firms im not bidding on? Im still very interested in a number of them.thesealocust wrote:No.Anonymous User wrote:So is it acceptable to mass mail firms that are coming to OCI if the system is all lottery?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login