Poverty, taste, and biglaw Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are revealing sensitive employment related information about a firm, job, etc. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned.
-
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:39 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
Jesus Christ, SC was just trying to point out that the OP should take some solace in the fact that s/he won't be the only person who might feel uncomfortable negotiating the firm culture. Lots of people come from backgrounds that alienate them a bit from those conventionally in positions of power in these kinds of institutions, which seems relatively uncontroversial. Give it a rest.
-
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:23 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
and, I might add, needs to worry more about social faux pas than the OP.Stringer6 wrote:Whoever turned this into a politics discussion is a jerk
Last edited by Renzo on Fri Apr 29, 2011 10:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Leira7905
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:42 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
It doesn't mean he's not qualified either... terrible assumption.Stanislaw Carter wrote:You don't know anything about me.*Is straight from undergrad*
Nope. I just think that you have no valuable insight because you haven't worked at a big law firm, and that working for another corporation doesn't necessarily make you qualified to speak on this issue.*Thinks that no 1Ls have valuable insight into working in a professional environment with highly paid professionals*
- Julio_El_Chavo
- Posts: 803
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 11:09 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
this thread has turned into:
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
I'm not at all making a general statement about class seniority and qualification to comment. For example, if one was an analyst at Goldman Sachs prior to law school, I'd think that person would have a lot to add.What? Why do you have to be 2L, 3L, and beyond to have had experience interacting with professionals with a higher socio-economic status... Some people have relevant input from previous professions/life experience.
I am speaking specifically about veyron because I have read his post history and know that his background qualifies him to say nothing here. From what I can tell, he's a middling 1L who posts endlessly about jobs he's never going to get.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
is this now just a cute pissing contest between the two of you? lol because i dont think you guys were even in actual conflict over the original point lol
- Leira7905
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:42 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
Sorry.DoubleChecks wrote:is this now just a cute pissing contest between the two of you? lol because i dont think you guys were even in actual conflict over the original point lol
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
lol nah, actually i shouldnt have contributed either (stoking the fire), though this thread is pretty derailed by now haha.Leira7905 wrote:Sorry.DoubleChecks wrote:is this now just a cute pissing contest between the two of you? lol because i dont think you guys were even in actual conflict over the original point lol
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2011 11:07 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
My bad. I also dislike veyron, so that might have heightened things. I'm done now.
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
No, no, give in to your anger. With each passing moment you make yourself more my servant.Stanislaw Carter wrote:My bad. I also dislike veyron, so that might have heightened things. I'm done now.
*Grins maniacally*
- Leira7905
- Posts: 383
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:42 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
Sith Lord Veyron.... has a nice ring to it.Veyron wrote:Give in to your anger. With each passing moment you make yourself more my servant.Stanislaw Carter wrote:My bad. I also dislike veyron, so that might have heightened things. I'm done now.
*Grins maniacally*
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 4:32 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
Bugatti sounds better
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
No, Sith Lord Bugatti sounds like a pimp.gabbagabba wrote:Bugatti sounds better
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rinkrat19
- Posts: 13922
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 5:35 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
Back to the original topic...Anonymous User wrote:I don't wanna out myself.
I am very very poor. I bought my OCI suit at target. Never been to any fancy restaurant, never played golf, never skied, tasted wine, been to operas, etc.
I am going to work for a Biglaw this summer. I can imagine partners and associates there are wealthy. They probably often talk about playing golf, skiing, or whatever luxurious activities, which I never imagine I would ever do.
Is this a problem? I guess, in those firm social events, I would look like Eliza Doolittle.
OP, why do you not imagine yourself at least trying some of those things someday? Be willing to try new stuff, especially since you'll have the cash to open up some more options! Take up a new "wealthy" hobby or two, they're fun! BTW, wine, nice food, golf and skiing are perfectly accessible to the middle class. Municipal golf courses are cheap and there are plenty of places to ski that aren't Aspen. You don't have to give up (or turn your back on) the things you grew up doing, but trying new things will also give you more common ground with other people everywhere, not just at work.
For now, be honest without constantly bringing up your background like it's some kind of excuse, and don't obstinately cling to your old way of doing everything when it's not appropriate. Say "You know, I'm no good with wine, what would you recommend?" instead of "shee-it, where I come from, Coors is what we drink when we're gettin' fancy, I don't want any of that fancy wine crap!"
Someone else mentioned table manners. Holy shit, yes. Nothing outs you like not knowing what to do with your napkin or holding your fork in your fist. There are books (and probably websites) that can teach you table manners, and it doesn't cost anything to read them and learn it. You probably won't be comfortable in a fancy restaurant until you've gone a few times, so it might be worth it to scrape up the change and go somewhere decent once in a while on your own. (And I'm not talking the Waldorf, just something nicer than Olive Garden.) Just go for a drink and dessert, if you can't splurge for a whole meal.
Be polite, be honest, be appreciative, be open to new things, and DON'T go all Uriah Heep, bowing and scraping and announcing to all and sundry how 'umble you are.
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
amyLAchemist wrote:First of all, the advice to be yourself and be interested in learning about new things is credited.
Second, I feel the same way at some events. And I am from the upper east side of New York. That being said, I never bought into snobbery for the sake of snobbery and refuse to engage in it. I am going to a very techie firm, and I actually really like the people that I have met at my firm - I truly enjoy firm events. Probably because people don't talk about annoying snobby bullshit.
But I've been to firm events (my boyfriend's firm, super old school firm) where people do. Some of it really is grin and bear it (and try not to eye roll people when they begin a sentence with "so I read in the New Yorker", they ask you what your favorite Robert Parker wine selection is, or if you prefer Sardinia or Corsica for vacation - ), but sometimes people want to teach you what they are talking about instead of just showing off their knowledge about rich people crap. It is actually in very poor taste for people you are with to "talk over" someone about something they don't know a lot about (i.e. a detailed conversation on wines). /rant
I have found that the partners are really easy to talk to, though, both at my firm and his. They seem interested in what my interests in law are and have great stories about their careers - people love talking about themselves, esp. big-egoed biglaw partners. I actually find it harder to interact with the staff than with partners or associates.
*Does not buy into snobbery*
*Mentions is from NYC (the upper east side no less) in third sentence*
- Kohinoor
- Posts: 2641
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:51 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
Very early on it was already the douchiest thread I've seen on TLS in a long time.Julio_El_Chavo wrote:this thread has turned into:
- Moxie
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
If you've watched the news/sports anytime before you go to an event, you should never be out of things to discuss. Just be sociable, not socially awkward, and you'll be fine.Anonymous User wrote:I don't wanna out myself.
I am very very poor. I bought my OCI suit at target. Never been to any fancy restaurant, never played golf, never skied, tasted wine, been to operas, etc.
I am going to work for a Biglaw this summer. I can imagine partners and associates there are wealthy. They probably often talk about playing golf, skiing, or whatever luxurious activities, which I never imagine I would ever do.
Is this a problem? I guess, in those firm social events, I would look like Eliza Doolittle.
Nobody cares how poor you were growing up, but also don't make a point of emphasizing it to them.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- crumpetsandtea
- Posts: 7147
- Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:57 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
... :\Veyron wrote:*Does not buy into snobbery*
*Mentions is from NYC (the upper east side no less) in third sentence*
I don't think she mentioned it as a subconscious attempt to be snobby or 'show off' that she was from the upper east side--she was trying to make OP feel better by saying that everyone feels like Eliza Doolittle in some situations, and sometimes it's less about you 'missing out on rich people things' and more about others being pretentious. There was no need to make a sarcastic comment, she was clearly only trying to help OP.
- FantasticMrFox
- Posts: 592
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 3:00 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
I think this is the best advice for you;Moxie wrote:If you've watched the news/sports anytime before you go to an event, you should never be out of things to discuss. Just be sociable, not socially awkward, and you'll be fine.Anonymous User wrote:I don't wanna out myself.
I am very very poor. I bought my OCI suit at target. Never been to any fancy restaurant, never played golf, never skied, tasted wine, been to operas, etc.
I am going to work for a Biglaw this summer. I can imagine partners and associates there are wealthy. They probably often talk about playing golf, skiing, or whatever luxurious activities, which I never imagine I would ever do.
Is this a problem? I guess, in those firm social events, I would look like Eliza Doolittle.
Nobody cares how poor you were growing up, but also don't make a point of emphasizing it to them.
You don't seem like an anti-social awkward creep but just a person shied into self-restraint from your socio-economic status so just don't cower either as soon as something is mentioned that you've never experienced due to cost. Besides, respect isn't (well, shouldn't) solely based with materialistic ruler; I've always valued genuine personalities over genuine brands.
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
Au contraire, I'm a fan of (deserved) snobbery, but I cannot abide by false modesty.crumpetsandtea wrote:... :\Veyron wrote:*Does not buy into snobbery*
*Mentions is from NYC (the upper east side no less) in third sentence*
I don't think she mentioned it as a subconscious attempt to be snobby or 'show off' that she was from the upper east side--she was trying to make OP feel better by saying that everyone feels like Eliza Doolittle in some situations, and sometimes it's less about you 'missing out on rich people things' and more about others being pretentious. There was no need to make a sarcastic comment, she was clearly only trying to help OP.
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
I'm going to take this time to warn everyone (especially those who have existing warnings) that we do ban people for race-baiting arguments in the on-topic forums. Let's get away from that right now so I don't have to start flashing red cards.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- worldtraveler
- Posts: 8676
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:47 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
OP I'm also from a more modest background than most of my classmates, and so occasionally I've been stuck in conversations like what you're describing. However, regardless of your background, there will be things you have in common with others. Some hobbies like watching movies or tv are pretty much universal and if you're worried about getting stuck in a conversation about yachts, bring up something else.
- Veyron
- Posts: 3595
- Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
Wait, biglawyers can afford yachts now?worldtraveler wrote:OP I'm also from a more modest background than most of my classmates, and so occasionally I've been stuck in conversations like what you're describing. However, regardless of your background, there will be things you have in common with others. Some hobbies like watching movies or tv are pretty much universal and if you're worried about getting stuck in a conversation about yachts, bring up something else.
-
- Posts: 2489
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
omg i LOVE thisswc65 wrote:--ImageRemoved--
-
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:12 pm
Re: Poverty, taste, and biglaw
veyron is so mad
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login