
http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2010/11/16 ... ink3|26690
This is "job security." Sure, once you land the job you'll probably be okay because the recession itself is no longer forcing firms under. But getting that job is the hard part. The millions of jobs in the legal field will remain - and so will the millions of people already working them.jbarl1 wrote:A friend sent me this (she is a nursing student) and I was shocked to see that legal careers landed at number 10. I'm not saying I believe it or not, I just thought I would share this glimmer of hope![]()
http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2010/11/16 ... ink3|26690
It does mention projected growth, but yes, very right you are.Tanicius wrote:This is "job security." Sure, once you land the job you'll probably be okay because the recession itself is no longer forcing firms under. But getting that job is the hard part. The millions of jobs in the legal field will remain - and so will the millions of people already working them.jbarl1 wrote:A friend sent me this (she is a nursing student) and I was shocked to see that legal careers landed at number 10. I'm not saying I believe it or not, I just thought I would share this glimmer of hope![]()
http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2010/11/16 ... ink3|26690
This is well-said. And with people living longer and healthier, the recession wiping out the value of many assets, jobs being so hard to come by if you give one up, and speculation that the Social Security minimum might be raised to balance the budget, all of that adds up to a whole lot of old people staying put well beyond the traditional retirement/move-to-greener-pastures age.Tanicius wrote:This is "job security." Sure, once you land the job you'll probably be okay because the recession itself is no longer forcing firms under. But getting that job is the hard part. The millions of jobs in the legal field will remain - and so will the millions of people already working them.jbarl1 wrote:A friend sent me this (she is a nursing student) and I was shocked to see that legal careers landed at number 10. I'm not saying I believe it or not, I just thought I would share this glimmer of hope![]()
http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2010/11/16 ... ink3|26690
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Notice how it doesn't say where the growth in lawyering will be coughindiacoughvanwinkle wrote:This is well-said. And with people living longer and healthier, the recession wiping out the value of many assets, jobs being so hard to come by if you give one up, and speculation that the Social Security minimum might be raised to balance the budget, all of that adds up to a whole lot of old people staying put well beyond the traditional retirement/move-to-greener-pastures age.Tanicius wrote:This is "job security." Sure, once you land the job you'll probably be okay because the recession itself is no longer forcing firms under. But getting that job is the hard part. The millions of jobs in the legal field will remain - and so will the millions of people already working them.jbarl1 wrote:A friend sent me this (she is a nursing student) and I was shocked to see that legal careers landed at number 10. I'm not saying I believe it or not, I just thought I would share this glimmer of hope![]()
http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2010/11/16 ... ink3|26690
It is better to be pleasantly surprised rather than unpleasantly surprised.jfb wrote:Man, TLS is predictable. Someone points out a potential positive sign in the field that we have all chosen to go into and every post is dedicated to explaining why its really not positive at all.
I live my life by this philosophy.AreJay711 wrote:It is better to be pleasantly surprised rather than unpleasantly surprised.jfb wrote:Man, TLS is predictable. Someone points out a potential positive sign in the field that we have all chosen to go into and every post is dedicated to explaining why its really not positive at all.
TLS is predictibly reasonable in taking things they see online with a grain of salt then?jfb wrote:Man, TLS is predictable. Someone points out a potential positive sign in the field that we have all chosen to go into and every post is dedicated to explaining why its really not positive at all.
Absolutely, and its an unexplainable reaction too. Every other sector sees good news and they are cautiously optimistic, good news on TLS = not really good news at all, actually it is probably bad news. Loljfb wrote:Man, TLS is predictable. Someone points out a potential positive sign in the field that we have all chosen to go into and every post is dedicated to explaining why its really not positive at all.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
UnTouChablE wrote:Absolutely, and its an unexplainable reaction too. Every other sector sees good news and they are cautiously optimistic, good news on TLS = not really good news at all, actually it is probably bad news. Loljfb wrote:Man, TLS is predictable. Someone points out a potential positive sign in the field that we have all chosen to go into and every post is dedicated to explaining why its really not positive at all.
Macy's hired 65000+ workers = Retail workers are skeptical because ppl are living longer [applying TLS logic to facts] lol.
Any Lawyer that wants to work past 65 is already doing so, any lawyer that is able to comfortably retire before then is retiring. There are very few lawyers watching the actions of the SSA seeing if they raise the retirement age. lol
Lets be happy, pre-ite might be coming back!!
FTFYUnTouChablE wrote: Lets be happy,pre-ite might be coming back!!we might be able to get jobs in India overseeing doc review.
nyc to 190 was a pre-ite meme. If BIGQE2 really does fuel the next lending boom, then inflation is inevitable and we need to adjust accordingly.dood wrote:nice, NYC to 190Kjbarl1 wrote:A friend sent me this (she is a nursing student) and I was shocked to see that legal careers landed at number 10. I'm not saying I believe it or not, I just thought I would share this glimmer of hope![]()
http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2010/11/16 ... ink3|26690
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
tytydood wrote:genius bro geniussolidsnake wrote:nyc to 190 was a pre-ite meme. If BIGQE2 really does fuel the next lending boom, then inflation is inevitable and we need to adjust accordingly.dood wrote:nice, NYC to 190Kjbarl1 wrote:A friend sent me this (she is a nursing student) and I was shocked to see that legal careers landed at number 10. I'm not saying I believe it or not, I just thought I would share this glimmer of hope![]()
http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2010/11/16 ... ink3|26690
NYC to 200k
Inflation is higher than it was 10 years ago but NYC BigLaw paid the same to first years this year as they did in 2000.solidsnake wrote:nyc to 190 was a pre-ite meme. If BIGQE2 really does fuel the next lending boom, then inflation is inevitable and we need to adjust accordingly.dood wrote:nice, NYC to 190Kjbarl1 wrote:A friend sent me this (she is a nursing student) and I was shocked to see that legal careers landed at number 10. I'm not saying I believe it or not, I just thought I would share this glimmer of hope![]()
http://jobs.aol.com/articles/2010/11/16 ... ink3|26690
NYC to 200k
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Because one is guaranteed yearly and one isn't?RVP11 wrote:I'm not sure why anyone would separate salary from bonus.
I'm not sure why anyone would separate salary from bonus in this context.James Bond wrote:Because one is guaranteed yearly and one isn't?RVP11 wrote:I'm not sure why anyone would separate salary from bonus.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login